AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Systems Modelling of a Fluid-driven Morphing Winglet Trailing Edge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, these pressure generation methods do not meet performance requirements, such as maximum pressure and continuous flow rate, which are essential for the intended aeronautical application. Vasista et al evaluate different pneumatic and hydraulic system architectures for a fluid-driven morphing winglet trailing edge at an early conceptual stage [29]. However, none of the pressure-driven concepts has, so far, been investigated with regard to the flow inside the structure and transient dynamic behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, these pressure generation methods do not meet performance requirements, such as maximum pressure and continuous flow rate, which are essential for the intended aeronautical application. Vasista et al evaluate different pneumatic and hydraulic system architectures for a fluid-driven morphing winglet trailing edge at an early conceptual stage [29]. However, none of the pressure-driven concepts has, so far, been investigated with regard to the flow inside the structure and transient dynamic behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape-flexible structures and components made of fiber-reinforced composites enable mass savings but can also achieve significantly improved aerodynamic efficiency, for example, as a component of morphing wing technologies. Examples of this are the work on the ‘FlexFoil system’ (Kota et al [ 4 ]), the ‘vertebrate structure’ (Elzey et al [ 5 ]), or the ‘droop nose’ (Vasista et al [ 6 ]). However, the problem with these concepts is the system-inherent contradiction between the required compliance and the necessary structural stiffness and strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to compliance selectivity as the capacity for structures to alter their stiffness as a function of time, in contrast to structures with spatially distributed reinforcements that show time-invariant, spatially varying modulus. 19 The type of selective compliance we explore in this paper can be achieved, for example, using mechanistic approaches, 20,21 by pressurized composites, 22,23 or bistable beam-like elements inside truss-like compliant systems. [24][25][26][27][28] Structures displaying such selectively compliant behavior leverage geometric effects that are independent of the constitutive material used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%