1999
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1999.164.01.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and magmatic segmentation of the Tertiary East Greenland Volcanic Rifted Margin

Abstract: The Tertiary East Greenland Volcanic Rifted Margin is characterized by massive magmatic construction that produced a distinctive crustal architecture including: (1) a thick pile of flood basalts continuing offshore as seismically imaged ‘seaward-dipping reflector sequences’; (2) an extensive margin-parallel mafic dyke swarm; and (3) shallow crustal gabbroic plutons and deeper crustal ‘underplated’ material. These igneous units developed in the framework of an asymmetrical, crustal-scale fold, or ‘flexure’, tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, Larsen & Marcussen (1992) Only parts of this extensive area have been investigated in detail, but the close proximity in the Early Palaeogene suggest that these two margins perhaps shared some magmatic centres prior to the sea-floor spreading in the region (Figs 2, 3). Locations for some possible triple junctions in this region in Early Palaeogene times have been implied previously by Burke & Dewey (1973), Bull & Masson (1996), Karson & Brooks (1999), Nielsen, Larsen & Hopper (2002) and Nielsen, Stephenson & Thomsen (2007), and locations of some separate large magmatic centres and domal uplifts have been recorded by Morgan & Barton (1990), Barton & White (1997), Larsen & Saunders (1998) and Elliot & Parson (2008). A hypothetical SE-trending failed rift arm or transform from a triple junction in the southern parts of the Hatton Bank (Figs 2, 3) would be sub-parallel to the South Hatton Lineament Kimbell et al 2005).…”
Section: The Spatial Distribution Of Known and Inferred Magmatic Centsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, Larsen & Marcussen (1992) Only parts of this extensive area have been investigated in detail, but the close proximity in the Early Palaeogene suggest that these two margins perhaps shared some magmatic centres prior to the sea-floor spreading in the region (Figs 2, 3). Locations for some possible triple junctions in this region in Early Palaeogene times have been implied previously by Burke & Dewey (1973), Bull & Masson (1996), Karson & Brooks (1999), Nielsen, Larsen & Hopper (2002) and Nielsen, Stephenson & Thomsen (2007), and locations of some separate large magmatic centres and domal uplifts have been recorded by Morgan & Barton (1990), Barton & White (1997), Larsen & Saunders (1998) and Elliot & Parson (2008). A hypothetical SE-trending failed rift arm or transform from a triple junction in the southern parts of the Hatton Bank (Figs 2, 3) would be sub-parallel to the South Hatton Lineament Kimbell et al 2005).…”
Section: The Spatial Distribution Of Known and Inferred Magmatic Centsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Callot, Geoffroy & Brun, 2002). The locations of hypothetical triple junctions at the CE Greenland margin have been estimated from Early Palaeogene magmatism and uplifts in the area (Larsen & Watt, 1985;Nielsen, 1987;Mathiesen, Bidstrup & Christiansen, 2000;Callot, Geoffroy & Brun, 2002;Peate, Larsen & Lesher, 2003) and from triple junction localities as suggested by Burke & Dewey (1973); Karson & Brooks (1999) and Tegner et al (2008). This vast area was characterized by Early Palaeogene episodic igneous activity and frequent migration of magmatic centres (Larsen & Watt, 1985;Peate, Larsen & Lesher, 2003), and at least three separate rifting events have been recorded for this region, some of which occurred far inland (Nielsen, 1987;Olesen et al 2007).…”
Section: The Spatial Distribution Of Known and Inferred Magmatic Centmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearya succession 2 is exposed north of succession 1 on Wootton Peninsula, but south of succession 1 east of Yelverton Bay. This is probably a consequence of a segmentation of the northern margin of Ellesmere Island, as described for the magma-rich rifted margin of central East Greenland (Karson & Brooks, 1999). During and after the emplacement of the rhyodacitic rocks, intrusion of mafic dykes occurred east of Yelverton Bay, but with a change towards a more transitional composition.…”
Section: Canadian Arcticmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The Yelverton Bay area (close to the Alpha Ridge of the Amerasia Basin) shows some characteristic features, which are known from magma-rich rifted (volcanic) margins worldwide (e.g., Menzies et al, 2002) and from central East Greenland (e.g., Karson & Brooks, 1999;Tegner et al, 2008) Our interpretation of the Yelverton Bay area as a magmarich rifted margin coincides with the tectonic model from Funck et al (2011) in which the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge was formed by seafloor-spreading parallel to the Canadian Polar margin (the Iceland model). A discussion about the involvement of a mantle plume that is postulated by Funck et al (2011) and many other authors is out of scope of this paper.…”
Section: North Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later dikes cut the dipping ones, demonstrating that the rotation and intrusion were broadly synchronous. Near the coast the dike density increases to nearly 100% in a sheeted dike complex marking the continent-ocean transition (Karson and Brooks 1999;Klausen and Larsen 2002;Nielsen 1978;Nielsen and Brooks 1981). Offshore, lavas and SDRs overlie mafic crust ϳ30 km thick.…”
Section: Northeast Atlantic Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%