2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-021-02011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and geochronological constraints on the magmatic and tectonic events in the pre-Alpine basement of the central parts of the Balkan fold–thrust belt (Central Stara Planina Mountains, Bulgaria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors also highlight that the Variscan Orogen in Bulgaria and the surrounding areas does not include an older phase of c. 340 Ma to 325 Ma magmatism, which was confirmed by recent work (e.g. Balkanska et al 2021). This implies a similar evolution of the Balkanides and the western part of the Variscan Orogeny exposed in the Iberian Massif, where c. 340 Ma to c. 325 Ma felsic intrusions are also absent (Dias et al 1998;Fernández-Suárez et al 2000).…”
Section: B Geochronological and Geochemical Arguments For Two-stage Magmatism In The Strandja Zonesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These authors also highlight that the Variscan Orogen in Bulgaria and the surrounding areas does not include an older phase of c. 340 Ma to 325 Ma magmatism, which was confirmed by recent work (e.g. Balkanska et al 2021). This implies a similar evolution of the Balkanides and the western part of the Variscan Orogeny exposed in the Iberian Massif, where c. 340 Ma to c. 325 Ma felsic intrusions are also absent (Dias et al 1998;Fernández-Suárez et al 2000).…”
Section: B Geochronological and Geochemical Arguments For Two-stage Magmatism In The Strandja Zonesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Okay et al 2001). The exact age of Variscan metamorphism in the Strandja Zone remains unknown, but it is well established from the Balkanides (c. 340 -330 Ma; Carrigan et al 2006;Antić et al 2016;Balkanska et al 2021). The second scenario assumes that subduction of the Palaeo-Tethys Ocean beneath Laurussia played a primary role, resulting in various intrusions of volcanic-arc granites (VAG) in the Strandja Zone (Okay et al 2001;Natal'in et al 2016;Peytcheva et al 2016;Aysal et al 2018;Bonev et al 2019a).…”
Section: B Geochronological and Geochemical Arguments For Two-stage Magmatism In The Strandja Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the Shivachevo complex, the Ribaritsa unit consists almost entirely of deformed in medium-to high-grade greenschist facies granitoids, which preliminary 206 Pb/ 238 U age data point to late Carboniferous (313.1±4.6 Ma) magma emplacement and crystallization (Antonov et al, 2010). Analogous greenschist deformation accommodated the slightly younger (307.8±3.9 Ma) Ambaritsa sheet-like pluton, constituting a considerable part of the Botev Vrah thrust, as it was related to a transpressional tectonics, revealed in the later stage of the Variscan evolution (Balkanska et al, 2021). Furthermore, the greenschist facies Shivachevo complex undoubtedly is a part of the basement of the Stara Planina Zone, since such low-grade metagranitoid units were not recognized in the Sredna Gora Zone basement.…”
Section: Results and Regional Implicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…251.5±1.3 Ma (Georgiev et al, 2013) intruded the lower Paleozoic lowgrade metasedimentary sequence in Central Stara Panina Mountain in the autochthone of the Paleogene Botev Vrah thrust. In the same area is exposed the 250.1±1 Ma old (Balkanska et al, 2021) Kalofer granitoid -part of the Hisarya-Pastrovo pluton. The preliminary data about the subvolcanic and volcanic bodies, exposed next to the town of Sliven is ca.…”
Section: Regional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%