2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional diversity of a culturable bacterial community during the early stages of revegetation near a Pb/Zn smelter in Guangdong, PR China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, we inferred that HA and FA were two other representative factors that affected the bacterial diversity but the content of other HM such as Cu and Ni did not. Several previous studies reported that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased while the relative abundance of Actinobacteria increased with an increasing HM concentration as evidenced by 16S rDNA-based banding patterns62, and HA and FA played crucial role in the bioavailability of soil HM and consequently affected the bacterial diversity63. In addition, the bacterial population at highly polluted sites (S2, S1 and S3) were much more different than that at lightly polluted sites (S4 and S5) because the communities at S4 and S5 were more similar to each other than the others, as shown in Figs 3b, 4 and 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2, we inferred that HA and FA were two other representative factors that affected the bacterial diversity but the content of other HM such as Cu and Ni did not. Several previous studies reported that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased while the relative abundance of Actinobacteria increased with an increasing HM concentration as evidenced by 16S rDNA-based banding patterns62, and HA and FA played crucial role in the bioavailability of soil HM and consequently affected the bacterial diversity63. In addition, the bacterial population at highly polluted sites (S2, S1 and S3) were much more different than that at lightly polluted sites (S4 and S5) because the communities at S4 and S5 were more similar to each other than the others, as shown in Figs 3b, 4 and 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in other studies, high soil metal loads were associated with high enzymatic activities (Kzlkaya, 2004;Pascual et al, 2004), and in other studies, shifts in the microbial community composition and functioning were found with metal load (Zhang et al, 2007). These results highlight the complexity of the effect of heavy metal contamination on soil enzyme activities and the need to consider the experimental details of each study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this study, we explored the responsiveness of culturable soil bacterial communities to soil management and their potential relationship to more commonly employed measures of soil perturbation (MBC, PMN, and CLPP). Culturable bacteria were sensitive and early indicators of change in metal-contaminated environments [27,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%