2021
DOI: 10.1134/s1063782621020196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Electronic Properties of ZnSiAs2, ZnSnAs2, and Their Mixed Crystals ZnSi1 – xSnxAs2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the calculation performed with GGA + mBJ potential has been reported more accurate because GGA + mBJ calculations are orbital independent by imbibing hybrid functional 33,37 . In addition, for the computations of electronic and optical properties of II‐IV‐V 2 compounds, GGA + mBJ has been reported as accurate potential 24,38–40 . A similar kind of trend is also observed in present calculations (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the calculation performed with GGA + mBJ potential has been reported more accurate because GGA + mBJ calculations are orbital independent by imbibing hybrid functional 33,37 . In addition, for the computations of electronic and optical properties of II‐IV‐V 2 compounds, GGA + mBJ has been reported as accurate potential 24,38–40 . A similar kind of trend is also observed in present calculations (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…33,37 In addition, for the computations of electronic and optical properties of II-IV-V 2 compounds, GGA + mBJ has been reported as accurate potential. 24,[38][39][40] A similar kind of trend is also observed in present calculations (Table 1). The bandgap obtained from GGA + mBJ approximation is 2.04 eV, whereas the computed bandgap from HSE06 18 and GW 12 approximations are 2.04 and 1.83 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Band and Dossupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations