2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of chemically deposited nanocrystalline PbS films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The collective effect of crystallite size and lattice strain due to dislocation was cause for the peak broadening of the sample [23]. The average particle size was calculated by Debey-Scherrer's formula [24] and size of the particles was 26.51 nm.…”
Section: Xrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The collective effect of crystallite size and lattice strain due to dislocation was cause for the peak broadening of the sample [23]. The average particle size was calculated by Debey-Scherrer's formula [24] and size of the particles was 26.51 nm.…”
Section: Xrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of molarity in the solution fastens the reaction and formation of crystallites becomes quicker, thereby increasing dislocation density [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12] are calculated using various proportions of screw and edge dislocations. The linear plots between (ΔK) 2 and K 2 C hkl (using eq.7) for the best fit are shown in the Fig 4. It has been observed that MWH plots give better fitting than WH plot .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming dislocations to be the main contributors to strain, the x-ray diffraction data are analyzed by modified Williamson-Hall (MWH) method [10][11][12][13][14]. In the MWH method, eq.…”
Section: Crystallite Size and Dislocation Density From Modified Willimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation