2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly sustainable development goals: Overcoming distances constraining responsible action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Bonnedahl et al argued that a strong sustainability perspective was the premise of shortening the distances between people and their actions in space, time, function, and relations. The classical IPAT equation was quoted as an example of why environmental concerns should be prioritized [81]. Zhongming et al stressed that strengthening the environmental dimensions was crucial for the accomplishments of SDGs in Asia and the Pacific [82].…”
Section: The Overview Analysis Of Sdg-related Academic Papers Since 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bonnedahl et al argued that a strong sustainability perspective was the premise of shortening the distances between people and their actions in space, time, function, and relations. The classical IPAT equation was quoted as an example of why environmental concerns should be prioritized [81]. Zhongming et al stressed that strengthening the environmental dimensions was crucial for the accomplishments of SDGs in Asia and the Pacific [82].…”
Section: The Overview Analysis Of Sdg-related Academic Papers Since 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of publications tackling the topic of sustainable development increased significantly over the past 20 years. Associated papers mainly focused on: the essence and origin of the concept (Lawn, 2001;Strange & Bayley, 2008;Waas, 2011;Janousková et al, 2019;Ruggerio, 2021;Bellantuono et al, 2022); barriers to and conditions for its implementation (Nasibulina, 2015;Raszkowski & Bartniczak, 2019;Mio et al, 2020;Berchin et al, 2021;Otamendi-Irizar et al, 2022;Bonnedahl et al, 2022); planning, including formulating sustainable development strategies at various management levels (United Nations, 2015; Wang et al, 2015;Allen et al, 2016;Grainger-Brown & Malekpour, 2019;Qu et al, 2020;Guan et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2022); promoting best practices and models in implementing SD (Charrouf & Guillaume, 2009;Häikiö, 2014;Ross, 2018;Bin Mohd Yusof & Ariffin, 2020;Baba Ali et al, 2021;Gusheva et al, 2022) and relationships between sustainable development and various socio-economic concepts and phenomena (Bina, 2013;Olsson et al, 2014;Kasztelan, 2017;Corona et al, 2019;Dogaru, 2020;Belmonte-Ureña, 2021;Panchal, 2021;Zargartalebi, 2021;Rodríguez-Antón et al, 2022). Much attention was also devoted to monitoring and evaluating the implementation of sustainable development goals (SDG) (Radojicic et al, 2012;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…beigās globāla mēroga forumos, kā arī zinātniskajās publikācijās ekoloģiskā paradigma ir pamatota kā transdisciplināra paradigma, bet ekoloģiskā pieeja cilvēku domāšanā, bērnu/jauniešu attīstības veicināšanā, visa veida darbībā (visās cilvēkdarbības jomās, t.sk. izglītībā), atbildīgā rīcībā ir pamatota kā imperatīvs (Bronfenbrenner, 1996;Bruntland, 1987;Naess, 1973), kas arvien vairāk aktualizējies 21.gadsimtā (Bonnedahl, Heikkueinen, & Paavola, 2022;Katane, 2007;Katane & Pēks, 2006;Messerli & Murniningtyas, 2019;Mitranić, Miskeljin, & Breneselovic, 2019;Palmer & Neal, 2004), tad veiktā pētījuma mērķis bija: pamatot ekoloģiskās pieejas izpausmes daudzveidību jauniešu izglītībā valsts aizsardzības jomā.…”
Section: Ievads Introductionunclassified