2021
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202106724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Metal Phosphide–Phosphate Support Interaction for Enhanced Non‐Noble Metal Catalysis

Abstract: Strong metal‐support interaction (SMSI) is crucial for supported catalysts in heterogeneous catalysis. Here is the first report on strong metal phosphide‐phosphate support interaction (SMPSI). The key to SMPSI is the activation of P species on the support, which leads to simultaneous generation of metal phosphide nanoparticles (NPs) and core–shell nanostructures formed by support migration onto the NPs. The encapsulation state of metal phosphide and charge transfer are identical to those of classical SMSIs and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the O 1s spectra of XPS in Figures e and S7, compared with Cr-CoMoO 4 and P-Cr-CoMoO 4 , the Mo–O bond strength (530.3 eV) of E-Cr-CoMoO 4 decreases significantly and the strength of the Co–O/OH bond (531.2 eV) increases due to the leaching of Mo cations and exposure of more cobalt sites. , As for Figure S8, the doublets at 129.0 and 130.1 eV can be assigned to the phosphide, and a peak of PO 4 3– at 134.5/134.1 eV is attributed to surface oxidation in P-Cr-CoMoO 4 and PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 . , The content of phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is higher, proving that the phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is more sufficient, which is decided by its special surface structure. Finally, we further analyze the influence of alkaline etching and phosphating process at the surface properties of materials by comparing the content change of elements in different samples by XPS (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the O 1s spectra of XPS in Figures e and S7, compared with Cr-CoMoO 4 and P-Cr-CoMoO 4 , the Mo–O bond strength (530.3 eV) of E-Cr-CoMoO 4 decreases significantly and the strength of the Co–O/OH bond (531.2 eV) increases due to the leaching of Mo cations and exposure of more cobalt sites. , As for Figure S8, the doublets at 129.0 and 130.1 eV can be assigned to the phosphide, and a peak of PO 4 3– at 134.5/134.1 eV is attributed to surface oxidation in P-Cr-CoMoO 4 and PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 . , The content of phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is higher, proving that the phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is more sufficient, which is decided by its special surface structure. Finally, we further analyze the influence of alkaline etching and phosphating process at the surface properties of materials by comparing the content change of elements in different samples by XPS (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3− at 134.5/134.1 eV is attributed to surface oxidation in P-Cr-CoMoO 4 and PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 . 27,28 The content of phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is higher, proving that the phosphide in PE-Cr-CoMoO 4 is more sufficient, which is decided by its special surface structure. Finally, we further analyze the influence of alkaline etching and phosphating process at the surface properties of materials by comparing the content change of elements in different samples by XPS (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4,5 The classical SMSI has been mainly focusing on the reducible metal oxide supports with noble metals. 6 In addition, the oxide supported metal cluster or metal salt clusters have greatly magnified MSI in nano-catalysts and has plenty of potential in building the model of interfacial effects associated with MSI at the atomic level. 7 One interesting phenomenon that makes the oxide supports (TiO 2 , γ-Al 2 O 3 , etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the supports are not only acting as the carriers but also interacting with the active species. The significance of the interaction between the metal species and the support can be reflected from that strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) has been regarded as the most important concept in heterogeneous catalysis. The parallel influence of the oxide support upon the supported metal oxides or metal salts, like chlorides, sulfides, and carbides (represented as MX n ) through the MX n –support interaction is also striking and follows a similar pattern with SMSI. , The classical SMSI has been mainly focusing on the reducible metal oxide supports with noble metals . In addition, the oxide supported metal cluster or metal salt clusters have greatly magnified MSI in nano-catalysts and has plenty of potential in building the model of interfacial effects associated with MSI at the atomic level …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single atom catalysts (SACs), as a rising star in heterogeneous catalysis, exhibit a unique geometric/electronic structure and superior catalytic performance, which have attracted continuous interest. However, in hydrogenation reactions, the activity is strongly affected by electronic structure of the catalysts. The electron-deficient single atoms (SAs) should be less active for H 2 dissociation, resulting in low activity, which is generally rate limiting. , Thus, it is challenging to fabricate highly efficient catalysts with electron-rich active sites at the atomic scale . Nowadays, various protocols including introducing other components, forming vacancies, , constructing heterojunctions, and creating strong metal–support interactions, , have been developed to finely tune and control the electronic structure of catalysts. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%