2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong lensing as a giant telescope to localize the host galaxy of gravitational wave event

Abstract: Abstract Standard siren cosmology of gravitational wave (GW) merger events relies on the identification of host galaxies and their redshifts. But this can be highly challenging due to numerous candidates of galaxies in the GW localization area. We point out that the number of candidates can be reduced by orders of magnitude for strongly lensed GW events, due to extra observational constraints. For the next-generation GW detectors like Einstein Telescope (ET), we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These standard sirens are known to be self-calibrating, since these do not rely on a cosmic distance ladder. In order to get the redshift information of a GW event, and so place them on the luminosity distance-redshift (D L − z) relation, an accompanying electromagnetic signal is needed (see for instance Oguri 2016;Ding et al 2019;The LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al 2019;Mukherjee et al 2020;Yu, Zhang & Wang 2020, and references therein for other redshift measurement techniques in the case of dark standard sirens). Such a relation is clearly necessary for the reconstruction of the late-time cosmological expansion of the Universe, and has also been E-mail: amitra@lpnhe.in2p3.fr employed to constrain various cosmological parameters of modified theories of gravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These standard sirens are known to be self-calibrating, since these do not rely on a cosmic distance ladder. In order to get the redshift information of a GW event, and so place them on the luminosity distance-redshift (D L − z) relation, an accompanying electromagnetic signal is needed (see for instance Oguri 2016;Ding et al 2019;The LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al 2019;Mukherjee et al 2020;Yu, Zhang & Wang 2020, and references therein for other redshift measurement techniques in the case of dark standard sirens). Such a relation is clearly necessary for the reconstruction of the late-time cosmological expansion of the Universe, and has also been E-mail: amitra@lpnhe.in2p3.fr employed to constrain various cosmological parameters of modified theories of gravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the magnification is vital in the localization and follow-up cosmography of strongly lensed GWs (e.g. Sereno et al 2011;Hannuksela et al 2020;Yu et al 2020), if 𝜇 m significantly deviates from 1, microlensing might contaminate the signal to a degree that would affect these studies. Figure 6 gives the effective magnification as a function of the micro impact parameter 𝜂 m ∈ [0.1, 1.0]𝜃 m and mass of microlens 𝑚 ∈ [0, 100]M .…”
Section: Demagnification For the Microlensed Type 2 Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, searches for GW lensing using LIGO and Virgo data have also started (Hannuksela et al 2019;Li et al 2019a;McIsaac et al 2020;Pang et al 2020;Dai et al 2020;Liu et al 2020;Collaboration & Collaboration 2021), and many of the detection methodologies have been outlined in recent years (Cao et al 2014;Lai et al 2018;Christian et al 2018;Hannuksela et al 2019;Li et al 2019a;McIsaac et al 2020;Pang et al 2020;Hannuksela et al 2020;Dai et al 2020;Liu et al 2020;Wang et al 2021b;Lo & Magana Hernandez 2021;Janquart et al 2021a,b). If observed, lensed GWs could enable studies spanning the domains of fundamental physics, astrophysics, and cosmology Sereno et al (2011); Baker & Trodden (2017); Fan et al (2017); Liao et al (2017); Lai et al (2018); Liao (2019); Cao et al (2019); Li et al (2019b); Hou et al (2020); Mukherjee et al (2020a,b); Goyal et al (2020); Diego (2020); Hannuksela et al (2020); Yu et al (2020); Oguri & Takahashi (2020); Cremonese et al (2021); Finke et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of doubly imaged GWs, there are two pieces of information immediately accessible to us from the GWs: the time delay between the images and the flux ratio of the images (Sereno et al 2011;Yu et al 2020). However, these two pieces of information alone will not significantly constrain the lensing system as the time delay is degenerate with the lens mass distribution, and the alignment of lens and source on the sky.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%