2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing merging black holes with sub-arcsecond precision using gravitational-wave lensing

Abstract: The current gravitational-wave localization methods rely mainly on sources with electromagnetic counterparts. Unfortunately, a binary black hole does not emit light. Due to this, it is generally not possible to localize these objects precisely. However, strongly lensed gravitational waves, which are forecasted in this decade, could allow us to localize the binary by locating its lensed host galaxy. Identifying the correct host galaxy is challenging because there are hundreds to thousands of other lensed galaxi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, once strongly lensed pairs of events can be identified, joint parameter inference on the combined images (as introduced in this paper and independently by [53,54]) can significantly improve estimates of the source properties and location [59]. Hence, our approach is a key contribution toward the discovery of lensed GWs, which will advance our understanding of both cosmology and high-redshift black hole populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More generally, once strongly lensed pairs of events can be identified, joint parameter inference on the combined images (as introduced in this paper and independently by [53,54]) can significantly improve estimates of the source properties and location [59]. Hence, our approach is a key contribution toward the discovery of lensed GWs, which will advance our understanding of both cosmology and high-redshift black hole populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the B L=U can at least be used to rule out pairs that strongly disfavor the lensed hypothesis. More detailed analyses taking into account detailed lens modeling [59] or even targeted follow-up campaigns [60] may then become feasible on any strong remaining candidates. Also, as our knowledge of the astrophysical distribution of GW source systems improves, we will be able to better constrain the priors that go into this analysis and hence better distinguish promising candidates for lensed pairs from chance coincidences in parameter space.…”
Section: Recovered Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the previous section, many strong lensing science cases, such as the localisation of the host galaxies of merging black holes as well as lensing cosmography (Hannuksela et al 2020) rely on obtaining accurate magnification measurements from the macroimages, unhindered by microlensing (see also (Oguri & Marshall 2010;Cheung et al 2021), for discussion). Figure 3 shows that for microlenses of mass 𝑚 10𝑀 , the magnification of the image would not significantly affect these studies if the targeted accuracy is ∼ 10%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the magnification is vital in the localization and follow-up cosmography of strongly lensed GWs (e.g. Sereno et al 2011;Hannuksela et al 2020;Yu et al 2020), if 𝜇 m significantly deviates from 1, microlensing might contaminate the signal to a degree that would affect these studies. Figure 6 gives the effective magnification as a function of the micro impact parameter 𝜂 m ∈ [0.1, 1.0]𝜃 m and mass of microlens 𝑚 ∈ [0, 100]M .…”
Section: Demagnification For the Microlensed Type 2 Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation