2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.014017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong couplings and form factors of charmed mesons in holographic QCD

Abstract: We extend the two-flavor hard-wall holographic model of Erlich, Katz, Son and Stephanov [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261602 (2005)] to four flavors to incorporate strange and charm quarks. The model incorporates chiral and flavor symmetry breaking and provides a reasonable description of masses and weak decay constants of a variety of scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector strange and charmed mesons. In particular, we examine flavor symmetry breaking in the strong couplings of the ρ meson to the charmed D and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 for the two gluon propagators respectively D I and D II . Most of the numerical results are of the order of magnitude of the experimental data, < r 2 ρ > exp 0.28 − 0.56fm 2 [48,49], except the numerical results obtained with the gluon propagator D I for which the values are divided by a factor 10 By considering the gluon propagator I from Ref. [35,43] the expressions for g com va−j (Q1, Q2 = +Q1/2) and g com va−j (Q1, Q2 = −Q1/2) are plotted respectively in solid thick line and dashed thick line; g tr va−j (Q1, Q2 = +Q1/2) and g tr va−j (Q1, Q2 = −Q1/2) are plotted respectively in solid line and dashed line.…”
Section: A Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…9 for the two gluon propagators respectively D I and D II . Most of the numerical results are of the order of magnitude of the experimental data, < r 2 ρ > exp 0.28 − 0.56fm 2 [48,49], except the numerical results obtained with the gluon propagator D I for which the values are divided by a factor 10 By considering the gluon propagator I from Ref. [35,43] the expressions for g com va−j (Q1, Q2 = +Q1/2) and g com va−j (Q1, Q2 = −Q1/2) are plotted respectively in solid thick line and dashed thick line; g tr va−j (Q1, Q2 = +Q1/2) and g tr va−j (Q1, Q2 = −Q1/2) are plotted respectively in solid line and dashed line.…”
Section: A Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the experimental value of the decay constant f exp ρ = (152 ± 8) MeV [36,37]. The calculation of [6] schematically can be presented as a chain : 20) and the obtained value r 2 ρ = (0.56 ± 0.04) fm 2 one can consider as a theoretical extraction of the experimental value (see, e.g., [38]).…”
Section: The ρ-Meson Magnetic Moment In πAndρ Model Results and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is similar to the one used in the holographic model for chiral symmetry breaking[11,12] where the quark masses and chiral condensates are fixed by the meson masses and decay constants. See also[13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%