2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1312.4554
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strictly continuous extension of functionals with linear growth to the space BV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (z|y) denotes the dual product, and the subdifferential ∂Φ(y) is defined by z satisfying the same expression with γ = 0. With regard to more advanced strict convergence results, we point the reader to [25,38,35].…”
Section: From φ-Strict To Strong Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (z|y) denotes the dual product, and the subdifferential ∂Φ(y) is defined by z satisfying the same expression with γ = 0. With regard to more advanced strict convergence results, we point the reader to [25,38,35].…”
Section: From φ-Strict To Strong Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. Using the density of W 1,1 in BV with respect to area-strict convergence ( •strict convergence) 4 , together with the associated variant of Reshetnyak's continuity theo-rem ([12, Theorem 5] and, more general, [19,Theorem 1]), all our variants of quasi-sublinear growth from below have equivalent versions extending the class of test functions from W 1,1 to BV. Most importantly for our purposes, (3.2) is equivalent to the following:…”
Section: Variants Of Quasi-sublinear Growth From Belowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.6. If W 1,1 is dense in U with respect to area-strict convergence in BV ( •strict convergence in the notation of [12]), in particular if U = BV, u * can be chosen in W 1,1 (Ω; R n ) because F is area-strictly-continuous [19] (see also [12,Theorem 5] for a special case). In this case, χ Sn ∇u * → 0 in L 1 , and the proof of Proposition 5.5 still works even if we only assume that L N (S n ) → 0 (i.e.…”
Section: A Characterization Of Weak Lower Semicontinuitymentioning
confidence: 99%