2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of optimal parameters for image restoration problems

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.2. Second, in [19], we indeed prove that even for the non-smooth problem (as μ → 0), under appropriate assumptions on the given data, the optimal α, β are guaranteed to be strictly positive.…”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2.2. Second, in [19], we indeed prove that even for the non-smooth problem (as μ → 0), under appropriate assumptions on the given data, the optimal α, β are guaranteed to be strictly positive.…”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Remark 2.2 • Using the existence result in [19], in principle we could allow infinite values for α and β. This would include both TV 2 and TV as possible optimal regularisers in our learning problem.…”
Section: Theorem 21 We Consider the Learning Problem (23) For Tgv 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This becomes particularity easy to perform in a computationally feasible manner for learned updating operators of this form. Furthermore, introducing the non-linear component in (12) allows the learned operator to approximate a large set of non-linear operators [18].…”
Section: Parametrizing the Learned Updating Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a set-valued analysis of the solvability of such programs with further symmetric cone structure is performed in [49]. In certain cases, with a finite-dimensional control u in an otherwise infinite-dimensional problem, it is also possible to do away with the regularizer G [32].…”
Section: V) − K(u)mentioning
confidence: 99%