1992
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90201-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striatal subregions are differentially vulnerable to the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
65
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
65
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it appears that drug dispositional changes may occur only when METH pretreatment and/or binge doses are relatively high. Furthermore, particularly when lower doses have been used, the degree of protection has often appeared to be not only brain region-and transmitter-dependent, but also dependent on the specific measure of neurotransmitter function (Segal and Kuczenski, 1987;Eisch et al, 1992;Eisch and Marshall, 1998;Friedman et al, 1998;Wilson et al, 1994;Chapman et al, 2001). Thus, for example, when tested subsequent to the binge, whereas both basal DA and the stimulant-induced extracellular DA response are attenuated by an acute binge (Cass and Manning, 1999), only basal DA is protected when the binge is preceded by ED pretreatment (Segal and Kuczenski, 1997a, b, c;Kuczenski and Segal, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it appears that drug dispositional changes may occur only when METH pretreatment and/or binge doses are relatively high. Furthermore, particularly when lower doses have been used, the degree of protection has often appeared to be not only brain region-and transmitter-dependent, but also dependent on the specific measure of neurotransmitter function (Segal and Kuczenski, 1987;Eisch et al, 1992;Eisch and Marshall, 1998;Friedman et al, 1998;Wilson et al, 1994;Chapman et al, 2001). Thus, for example, when tested subsequent to the binge, whereas both basal DA and the stimulant-induced extracellular DA response are attenuated by an acute binge (Cass and Manning, 1999), only basal DA is protected when the binge is preceded by ED pretreatment (Segal and Kuczenski, 1997a, b, c;Kuczenski and Segal, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple injections are administered within a day, typically at 2-h intervals, to simulate the prolonged elevation of drug associated with binge-pattern administration in humans. Although several variations in this procedure have been studied, most researchers have reported a 'neurotoxic' profile which, especially at the higher doses, includes regionally specific damage to DA terminals as well as profound, although less persistent, changes in other neurotransmitter systems (Seiden and Ricaurte, 1987;Eisch et al, 1992;Axt et al, 1994;Bowyer and Holson, 1995;Pu and Vorhees, 1995;Cass, 1997;Fleckenstein et al, 2000;O'Callaghan and Miller, 2000). The mechanisms underlying these changes have received considerable attention, with many studies suggesting important roles for temperature and accumulation of reactive oxidative species, as well as other factors, in the cascade of changes that appear to result from this high-dose 'binge' protocol (Farfel and Seiden, 1994;Seiden and Sabol, 1995;Stephans and Yamamoto, 1996;Wrona et al, 1997;Xie et al, 2000;Davidson et al, 2001;Yuan et al, 2001;Larsen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather unexpectedly, although the NK-1 receptor blockade did not display protection on the 3rd and 7th day post-treatment, it also rescued METH-induced loss of DAT sites in NAc on the 14th and 28th day after treatment, suggesting the presence of both immediate and delayed neurotoxic reactions that contribute to long-term toxic effects induced by METH exposure. It is well known that NAc is more resistant to METH toxicity (Eisch et al 1992), but the mechanism underlying the regional heterogeneity of METH has not yet been elucidated. The dopamine transporter is believed to be an essential component of pathway leading to METH toxicity in the striatum (Fumagalli et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both mice and rats, acute repeated injections of METH produce long-lasting decreases in DA levels [145, 149-153], and long-term reductions in several DA markers, such as TH [144, 154, 155], DAT [152, 156, 157], and VMAT-2 [155, 157-159] within the striatum. Morphological studies demonstrate that the persistent loss of integrity of DA biochemical markers is due to the degeneration of DA axon terminals [145-149].…”
Section: Methamphetamine-induced Dopaminergic Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%