Striatal and midbrain connectivity with the hippocampus selectively boosts memory for contextual novelty

Abstract

The role of contextual expectation in processing familiar and novel stimuli was investigated in a series of experiments combining eye tracking, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and behavioral methods. An experimental paradigm emphasizing either familiarity or novelty detection at retrieval was used. The detection of unexpected familiar and novel stimuli, which were characterized by lower probability, engaged activity in midbrain and striatal structures. Specifically, detecting unexpected novel stimuli, relative to expected novel stimuli, produced greater activity in the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA), whereas the detection of unexpected familiar, relative to expected, familiar stimuli, elicited activity in the striatum/globus pallidus (GP). An effective connectivity analysis showed greater functional coupling between these two seed areas (GP and SN/VTA) and the hippocampus, for unexpected than for expected stimuli. Within this network of midbrain/striatal–hippocampal interactions two pathways are apparent; the direct SN–hippocampal pathway sensitive to unexpected novelty and the perirhinal–GP–hippocampal pathway sensitive to unexpected familiarity. In addition, increased eye fixations and pupil dilations also accompanied the detection of unexpected relative to expected familiar and novel stimuli, reflecting autonomic activity triggered by the functioning of these two pathways. Finally, subsequent memory for unexpected, relative to expected, familiar, and novel stimuli was characterized by enhanced recollection, but not familiarity, accuracy. Taken together, these findings suggest that a hippocampal–midbrain network, characterized by two distinct pathways, mediates encoding facilitation and most critically, that this facilitation is driven by contextual novelty, rather than by the absolute novelty of a stimulus. This contextually sensitive neural mechanism appears to elicit increased exploratory behavior, leading subsequently to greater recollection of the unexpected stimulus. © 2015 The Authors Hippocampus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Reduced Ventral Tegmental Area–Hippocampal Connectivity in Children and Adolescents Exposed to Early Threat

“…It will be important to evaluate whether learning signal in VTA is dulled and/or the transfer of new information into storage via the hippocampus. Moreover, it will be important to identify whether effects of trauma are specific to signaling related to certain types of information (e.g., cues vs. contexts), motivational relevance (e.g., value, salience, changes in the environment), or of novelty (e.g., stimulus novelty, associative novelty) – all of which have been linked to dopamine signaling (11, 19, 51). Results could have exciting new implications for interventions.…”

A Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory

“…Value and expectation strongly influence viewing [86, 87], which has not been considered in most studies on reward and its expectation.…”

Behavioral, physiological, and neural signatures of surprise during naturalistic sports viewing

“…Classically, the VTA 43,44 and NAcc 12,45,46 respond strongly when rewards are larger or earlier than expected (i.e., reward prediction errors, or RPEs). However, the VTA can respond more broadly to variables other than reward 47 , including sensory PEs 48-50 , unexpected events 51,52 , aversive PEs 53 , changes in hidden belief states 31,54 , reward expectation 55,56 , advance information 57 , and stimulusstimulus learning 58 , all in the absence of (or controlling for) reward.…”