2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2010.0436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stretchable dipole antenna for body area networks at 2.45 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, as shown in Table S4 in the Supporting Information, most of the reported stretchable antennas suffered from dramatic decrease of reflection | S 11 | under large strains (>100%). In comparison, our S‐MXene antenna was highly stretchable (up to 150%), and the relative changes of reflection | S 11 | were smaller (9% under 100% strain, and 20% under 150% strain) than the values reported in the literature 5,7b,19i,25. To further quantify the mechanical stability of our S‐MXene antenna in terms of reflection changes under different strains, we further calculated the quality factors ( Q antenna ) by following Equation , Qantenna=[]false(LεL0false)/L0/[]||S11,ε||S11,0/S11,0 where L 0 and L ε are the length of antenna before and after stretching, and | S 11,0 | and | S 11, ε | are the corresponding reflection, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…To the best of our knowledge, as shown in Table S4 in the Supporting Information, most of the reported stretchable antennas suffered from dramatic decrease of reflection | S 11 | under large strains (>100%). In comparison, our S‐MXene antenna was highly stretchable (up to 150%), and the relative changes of reflection | S 11 | were smaller (9% under 100% strain, and 20% under 150% strain) than the values reported in the literature 5,7b,19i,25. To further quantify the mechanical stability of our S‐MXene antenna in terms of reflection changes under different strains, we further calculated the quality factors ( Q antenna ) by following Equation , Qantenna=[]false(LεL0false)/L0/[]||S11,ε||S11,0/S11,0 where L 0 and L ε are the length of antenna before and after stretching, and | S 11,0 | and | S 11, ε | are the corresponding reflection, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Comparison of the return loss of the antenna at different strains with typical literature results was listed in Figure 6a and Table S4 (Supporting Information). [10,29,[48][49][50] Our antenna showed much lower return loss for the investigated strains compared with literature results. Figure 6b shows the strain dependence of the percent change of return loss ΔS 11 /S 11max = (S 11 (ε) − S 11max )/S 11max , where S 11 (ε) and S 11max are the return losses at strain (ε) and at the maximum strain, respectively.…”
Section: Wwwadvelectronicmatdesupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Antenna being a radiative element with a strong dependence on the wavelength of the signal and the shape of the mounting platform must be thoroughly investigated for its performance in such applications. There have been several exciting works showcasing a stretchable antenna in the past . These systems radiate at different resonant frequencies due to a change in length of the antenna on elongation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%