2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stressful politics: Voters’ cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research supports that current events, including election results, can impact health outcomes [2, 3]. For example, following the attacks on September 11th, health outcomes for Arab Americans worsened including lowered life expectancies and increased rates of premature births.…”
Section: How Has the Presidential Election Affected Young Americans?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research supports that current events, including election results, can impact health outcomes [2, 3]. For example, following the attacks on September 11th, health outcomes for Arab Americans worsened including lowered life expectancies and increased rates of premature births.…”
Section: How Has the Presidential Election Affected Young Americans?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will continue to explore the impact of political events on youth in the US through ongoing quantitative and qualitative data collection. This research adds to the limited evidence that election results can impact emotional and physical health [1–3], though more research is needed to investigate this phenomenon in a representative sample of youth and to examine the long-term effects.…”
Section: How Has the Presidential Election Affected Young Americans?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva samples were processed and radioimmuno assayed (see for details: Stanton, Beehner, Saini, Kuhn, & LaBar, 2009;Stanton, LaBar, Saini, Kuhn, & Beehner, 2010). Analytical sensitivity (B 0 -3 SD) was 2.93 pg/mL for testosterone and 0.04 ng/mL for cortisol.…”
Section: Physiological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that political participation likely involves a complex combination of psychological factors that are associated with HPA activity, variation in HPA function may be predictive of the relatively stable individual differences in political involvement. Several studies have addressed the consequences of political participation on subsequent cortisol levels, demonstrating that cortisol levels are higher on election days than on nonelection days [33], that cortisol levels in supporters of losing candidates are elevated relative to cortisol levels in supporters of winning candidates [34], and that highly politically-partisan participants exhibit elevated cortisol after reading a post-election political essay, relative to reading a nonpolitical text passage [35]. To our knowledge, however, the notion that individual differences in the fundamental operating characteristics of the HPA axis are correlated with, and hence may be causally related to variation in the likelihood of engaging in political activity, has not been tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%