1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(97)00150-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress state in front of a crack perpendicular to bimaterial interface

Abstract: Abstract--Using a dislocation simulation approach, the basic equation for a crack perpendicular to a bimaterial interface is formulated in this paper. A novel expansion method is proposed for solving the problem. The complete solution for the problem, including the T stress ahead of the crack tip and the stress intensity factors are presented. The stress field characteristics are analyzed in detail. It is found that ahead of the crack tip and near the interface the normal stress, perpendicular to the crack pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case: (1) the inverse square root asymptote also agrees well with the exact solution within about 0.15ε from the crack tip; (2) however, the asymptote increasingly overestimates stresses as the distance from the crack tip grows, reaching about 30% at R = 0.7ε; and (3) it grossly overestimates the values of stresses near the interface (R = 0). The observed stress distributions agree with the data reported by [Wang and Stahle 1998] who investigated the crack approaching the interface by means of the semi-analytical dislocation approach. The actual size of the K-dominance zone, which is proportional to ε, decreases for the crack approaching the interface.…”
Section: Stability Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case: (1) the inverse square root asymptote also agrees well with the exact solution within about 0.15ε from the crack tip; (2) however, the asymptote increasingly overestimates stresses as the distance from the crack tip grows, reaching about 30% at R = 0.7ε; and (3) it grossly overestimates the values of stresses near the interface (R = 0). The observed stress distributions agree with the data reported by [Wang and Stahle 1998] who investigated the crack approaching the interface by means of the semi-analytical dislocation approach. The actual size of the K-dominance zone, which is proportional to ε, decreases for the crack approaching the interface.…”
Section: Stability Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cook and Erdogan [1972] and Erdogan and Biricikoglu [1973] derived the integral equations and provided the numerical solutions for fully imbedded semi-infinite and finite cracks, and for cracks either terminating at or crossing the material interface. A similar dislocation approach was employed by [Wang and Stahle 1998] for the study of stress fields in the vicinity of a finite crack approaching the interface. Using the exact solution obtained for Mode III as a prototype, Atkinson [1975] introduced an asymptotic solution for the SIF with respect to a small distance ε between the crack tip and the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Chen [5] used photoelasticity to determine the stress distribution and the stress intensity of a crack perpendicular to the interface. Wang and Stahle [6,7] used the dislocation simulation approach to investigate a crack perpendicular to and terminating at the bimaterial interface. Lin and Mar [8] presented a finite element analysis of the stress intensity factors for cracks perpendicular to the bimaterial interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital photo-elastic experiments were carried out to confirm their theoretical analysis. Wang and Stahle [18] analyzed the effect of T stress on the normal stress ahead of the tip of a crack perpendicular to a bimaterial interface. Guo et al [19] examined the problem of a crack embedded in a functionally graded coating and perpendicular to an interface between the coating and a substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%