2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress state dependence of in-reactor creep and swelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) and (7) of [1] are correct as published and the data reported in ''Stress state dependence of in-reactor creep and swelling. Part II: experimental results'' [2] were fitted to these equations. However, errors were made in recasting these equations and fitting parameters in forms that can be related to the empirical equations that have been used extensively in analysis and reporting of irradiation creep and swelling data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(6) and (7) of [1] are correct as published and the data reported in ''Stress state dependence of in-reactor creep and swelling. Part II: experimental results'' [2] were fitted to these equations. However, errors were made in recasting these equations and fitting parameters in forms that can be related to the empirical equations that have been used extensively in analysis and reporting of irradiation creep and swelling data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Eqs. (6) and (7) of [1] are correct as published and the data reported in ''Stress state dependence of in-reactor creep and swelling. Part II: experimental results'' [2] were fitted to these equations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, in the low stress range, a power law formulation of irradiation creep rate is typically characterized by a stress exponent of 1, diffusional creep being the dominating mechanism (NabarroHerring or Coble creep). However, at large stresses, the stress exponent of 4-5 and as high as 7 have been documented for various Uranium alloys [46,[50][51][52][53][54][55]. This mechanism is attributed to dislocation creep.…”
Section: Model and Experiments Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%