Stress, Resilience and Moral Distress among Health Care Providers During COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine level of stress, resilience and moral distress among health care providers during covid-19 pandemic. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study performed using an online questionnaire. Data was collected from Health Care Providers, working in various tertiary care hospitals of Lahore, using an online questionnaire. Perceived stress scale (PSS), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) and Moral Distress Thermometer were used to determine level of stress, resilience and moral stress respectively among the HCPs. Scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with scores of 0-13, 14-26 and 27-40 being considered as low, moderate and high stress respectively. The Moral Distress Thermometer has scores ranging from 0-10 with value of ≥4 considered high. Data was analyzed using SPSS version.23.Descriptive variables were reported as means and frequencies. Intergroup analysis was done using Chi square test with p<0.05 taken as significant. Results: A total of 278 (n=278) HCPs participated in study. According to the PSS (Perceived Stress Scale) scores, 5.03% (14) reported low, 86.69% (241) moderate and 8.27% (23) high stress levels. The mean stress score is 21.56+/-4.32. Providing patient care (mean = 2.28+/-1.15 SD) and transmitting infection to others (mean = 3.02+/-1.10 SD) were deemed major causes of stress. The mean CD-RISC score was 23.14+/-7.81 SD. Only 10.8% (30) had a score of ≥ 32. The mean Moral Distress score was 4.2+/-2.98 SD, with 53.2% (149) participants reporting high Moral distress (score ≥4). Conclusion: The high level of stress among HCPs during COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need of urgent measures to overcome this psychological issue which if left un-addressed can affect performance of HCPs. Key Words: Stress, Resilience, HCPs How to cite: Latif A., Yaqub S., Dar A.Q., Awan S.U., Farhat Hina., Khokhar A.M., Stress, Resilience and Moral Distress among Health care Providers during COVID-19 pandemic. Esculapio 2021;17 (01):79-82

How International Health System Austerity Responses to the 2008 Financial Crisis Impacted Health System and Workforce Resilience – A Realist Review

“…“Moral distress is the painful psychological disequilibrium that results from recognizing the ethically appropriate action, yet not taking it, because of such obstacles as lack of time, supervisory reluctance, an inhibiting medical power structure, institution policy, or legal considerations.” 110 …”

“…Health professionals experience moral distress – a painful psychological imbalance resulting from not being in a position to take ethically appropriate action, because in the case of austerity, generating efficiencies are no longer possible. 110 , 112 , 121 , 122 Once again, this results in a diminished view of the profession, apathy and burnout, starting to generate a cyclical and destructive interplay between CMOCs. 109 Moreover, if moral distress is not treated appropriately, can result in ‘moral residue,’ where past moral distress can lie dormant until the next shock, when it resurfaces unexpectedly.…”

“…109 Moral Distress "Moral distress is the painful psychological disequilibrium that results from recognizing the ethically appropriate action, yet not taking it, because of such obstacles as lack of time, supervisory reluctance, an inhibiting medical power structure, institution policy, or legal considerations. " 110 Moral Residue "Past distress may remain a dormant part of a person's subjectivity and re-emerge or become (re)enacted in the narrations of those past distressing experiences (this can be related to what Hardingham [2004] called 'moral residue'). " 111 Lipsky's Street Level Bureaucrats -Interpreted for Healthcare Professionals "Lipsky's theory: (1) SLBs are well-intentioned and at least initially committed to public service.…”

Stress, resilience, and moral distress among health care providers in oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…In response to the rapidly evolving pandemic circumstances, we made the decision to shorten the recall period to 7 days ( 45 ). This adjustment aimed to capture immediate and contextually relevant stressors and experiences encountered by HCPs in their demanding roles within the healthcare system.…”