2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2006. Digest of Technical Papers.
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2006.1705216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Proximity Technique for Performance Improvement with Dual Stress Liner at 45nm Technology and Beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the L gate of the strained device needs to be the same in order to keep similar strain in the channel. This is because the channel strain is gate-length dependent in process-induced strain silicon devices [10]- [13]. From Fig.…”
Section: Devices and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that the L gate of the strained device needs to be the same in order to keep similar strain in the channel. This is because the channel strain is gate-length dependent in process-induced strain silicon devices [10]- [13]. From Fig.…”
Section: Devices and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The amount of improvement is dependent on the stress liner used and the space width as well. For a 45-nm CMOS technology, a 20% improvement of pMOS performance is observed for SPT when the same compressive nitride liner is used, while nMOS is improved by 3% [37]. The most critical process of SPT is the RIE used for spacer removal.…”
Section: Stress Proximity Technique (Spt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSL (i.e. a tensile nitride layer over the nMOSFET and a compressive nitride later over the pMOSFET) improves the drive currents of ''n'' and ''p'' MOSFETs (Chen 2006). Another way of introducing a local strain in the device is through stress memorisation technique (SMT) (Ortolland 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%