Stress in Organizations

Sonnentag, Sabine

doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop212021

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 257 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The JSI contains a range of stressors and resources that have repeatedly been found to be associated with health and well-being across different occupational groups 67,75,82,83 ; it focuses on task related as well as social stressors and resources at the workplace and thus on conditions that can be influenced by work and organizational design. To measure both stressors and resources, we used the Instrument for Stress Related Task Analysis 75,84 and the Salutogenetic Subjective Work Analysis Instrument SALSA 85 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stress at Work and Well-being Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Galliker,

Igic,

Semmer

et al. 2023

J Occup Environ Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To analyze the development of conditions at work and health-related variables (notably exhaustion) in Switzerland longitudinally before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Questionnaire data were collected from a population-based sample of 1,553 employees in February 2020 and one year later. Health and well-being associated with a) working conditions in general and b) COVID-19-specific predictors such as worries about being infected and conditions for working at home were analyzed employing analysis of (co)variance and multiple regression. Results Conditions at work and well-being were stable overall, even indicating slight improvements, notably for men compared to women. Both an index representing stressors and resources at work in general (Job-Stress Index) and a COVID-19-related demand index showed consistent effects on health. Conclusions COVID-19-specific aspects may impact health indicators differently depending on the work context.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Social stressors describe stressors in the interpersonal sphere 83,87 . Social stressors in relation to superiors capture, for example, conflicts with superiors or being blamed for mistakes made by the superior (five items, eg, “I often quarrel with my superior”).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stress at Work and Well-being Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Galliker,

Igic,

Semmer

et al. 2023

J Occup Environ Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These are the Conservation of Resources Theory, Person-Environment Fit Theory, Job Demand and Resources Theory, Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping, Davis' Technology Acceptance Model, Role Theory, Coping Theory, Job Characteristics Theory, and Self-Determination Theory. According to Figure 5, the theoretical model used in this paper is based on a theory that studies human behaviour as rooted in social psychology Sonnentag & Frese 2013), such as the Conservation of Resources Theory (Harris et al 2021;Ninaus et al 2015;Srivastava et al 2015), the Socio-Technical Theory and Role Theory (Jena 2015;Tarafdar et al 2007), Social Cognitive Theory (Cao & Yu 2019;Salanova et al 2013), Person-Environment Fit Theory (Ayyagari et al 2011;Califf & Brooks 2020;Stich et al 2019), Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping (Fischer & Riedl 2017;Hung et al 2011;Ragu-Nathan et al 2008), Job Demand and Resources Theory (Ma et al 2021;Salanova et al 2013), Davis' Technology Acceptance Model Oksa et al 2021) Srivastava et al 2015;Yu et al 2018), Job Characteristics Theory (Brooks & Califf 2017), and Self-Determination Theory (Panisoara et al 2020).…”

Section: Analysis Of Methodological Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technostress and Job Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of technology in daily life and tasks has led to a variety of job outcomes. These were previously referred to under various terms and concepts used by past researchers. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted and since this phenomenon is still new and in the exploratory phase, this technique will give an overview of the trend shown in past studies as related to impact on job outcomes. Data for this article were gathered from the Scopus and Web of Science databases from 1982 to 2021. Seventy articles were finalized from 269 found at the initial stage through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting method. The study has identified and combined as many as ten terms and concepts into job outcome dimensions and further developed a conceptual framework between technostress and job outcomes. The trend and combination of these dimensions will be a source of reference and guidelines for organizations to formulate intervention measures to reduce the impact of technostress on job outcomes. Meanwhile, further research is recommended to focus on the role of mediating and moderating factors that may also affect job outcomes.

show abstract

“…For example, SPP has been linked to high sensitivity to social stressors (i.e., coworker conflicts; Kleszewski & Otto, 2020), which inhibits detachment in employees . Future research could assess different groups of workplace stressors, such as task-related, social, and role stressors, as suggested by Sonnentag and Frese (2012) and investigate whether the present findings generalize across these groups. Further, the scale we used to assess time pressure should be considered a subjective measure.…”

Section: Strengths Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Far from perfect sleep: A diary study on multidimensional perfectionism in the context of the stressor–detachment model.

Matick,

Kleszewski,

Otto

2023

International Journal of Stress Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP) but not self-oriented perfectionism (SOP) makes individuals vulnerable for impaired sleep quality. However, the mechanisms that link multidimensional perfectionism to varying sleep remain unclear, especially in applied settings, such as the workplace. Integrating the cognitive–affective personality system theory and the stressor–detachment model (SDM), we proposed time pressure and detachment as relevant mechanisms. We expected SPP to have a negative indirect effect on daily sleep quality through detachment and a serial mediation of time pressure and detachment. Further, we expected SOP to show ambivalent effects, displaying a negative indirect effect on daily sleep quality through detachment, but also a positive indirect effect through serial mediation. We tested our hypotheses with data from 70 employees that participated in a diary study over 5 consecutive days (day level N = 233). Results from multilevel path analyses provided support for the expected serial mediation linking SPP to impaired sleep quality. Additional exploratory analyses confirmed this serial mediation for all four components of sleep quality. Further, a direct positive effect of SOP on sleep quality was found. Our findings highlight the conjoint role of mechanisms in the work and nonwork area, that is, time pressure and subsequent detachment, for the association between SPP and sleep quality. Thus, the results suggest an active role of individuals in contributing to job stressors. We discuss personality as an additional predictor in the SDM and how organizations may include individual and organizational sources of stress in comprehensive intervention approaches.

show abstract

Stress in Organizations

Cited by 13 publications

References 257 publications

Stress at Work and Well-being Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Stress at Work and Well-being Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Technostress and Job Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review

Far from perfect sleep: A diary study on multidimensional perfectionism in the context of the stressor–detachment model.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About