1975
DOI: 10.1159/000259666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress in Icelandic

Abstract: The author sets out to reconsider the relationships between stress and quantity in Icelandic. He comes to the conclusion that since in Icelandic the same line separates stress from non-stress and the long from the short, there is no need to introduce both length and stress into the phonological description of this language. The only objective criterion of classifying Icelandic syllables is the so-called quantitative peak. Icelandic, as well as all the other Germanic languages and Russian, shows that stress doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will distinguish between stress (prominence relations) and intonational tunes (pitch contours), as is customary in intonational phonology (Ladd 1996;Liberman 1975;Pierrehumbert 1980). As is well known, stress can be cued independently of pitch, e.g.…”
Section: Stress: Evidence For (Im)mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will distinguish between stress (prominence relations) and intonational tunes (pitch contours), as is customary in intonational phonology (Ladd 1996;Liberman 1975;Pierrehumbert 1980). As is well known, stress can be cued independently of pitch, e.g.…”
Section: Stress: Evidence For (Im)mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%