2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress effects on the energy barrier and mechanisms of cross-slip in FCC nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Kang et al (2014) showed that both stress components have a comparable effect on the activation enthalpy. This assertion has been thoroughly verified using different formulations of the Line Tension (LT) model (Kang et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2019;Longsworth and Fivel, 2021), linear-elasticity models (Longsworth and Fivel, 2021;Kuykendall et al, 2020) and atomistic simulations (Kang et al, 2014;Esteban-Manzanares et al, 2020;Kuykendall et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2019). Therefore, the influence of all the stress components should be considered in the cross-slip rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Kang et al (2014) showed that both stress components have a comparable effect on the activation enthalpy. This assertion has been thoroughly verified using different formulations of the Line Tension (LT) model (Kang et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2019;Longsworth and Fivel, 2021), linear-elasticity models (Longsworth and Fivel, 2021;Kuykendall et al, 2020) and atomistic simulations (Kang et al, 2014;Esteban-Manzanares et al, 2020;Kuykendall et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2019). Therefore, the influence of all the stress components should be considered in the cross-slip rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…25. The only free parameter in the theory of Malka-Markovitz and Mordehai ( 2019) is the unstressed energy barrier ∆E 0 , which can be obtained either from line tension models (Kang et al, 2014;Malka-Markovitz and Mordehai, 2019), atomistic simulations (Oren et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Esteban-Manzanares et al, 2020;Kuykendall et al, 2020) or DD simulations (Ramírez et al, 2012;Longsworth and Fivel, 2021). In the present paper, the energy barrier of FCC copper ∆E 0 = 1.9 eV was obtained from DD simulations (Longsworth and Fivel, 2021) to make the work independent of other numerical results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The enthalpy barrier Q cs decreases with the applied shear stress. Kuykendall et al [78] noted that Kubin et al [79] proposed that the Schmid stress on the original glide plane is the most important stress component. It is therefore written as…”
Section: Appendix B: Cross-slip Recovery Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the leading and trailing partials are univocally defined in the presence of a Schmid stress. In that case,û must point towards the bowing-out direction because the energy barrier does not depend on the sign of the Schmid stress [2,4,27] .…”
Section: Elastic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, W. Kuykendall et al [27] used atomistic simulations to examine the effect of stress on the energy barrier of cross-slip via FE and FL mechanisms in FCC Ni. They concluded that the FE mechanism prevails when the Escaig stress on the glide plane is dominant, and that increasing the Schmid and Escaig stress on the cross-slip plane promotes the FL mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%