2019
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress effects on learning and feedback‐related neural activity depend on feedback delay

Abstract: The adaptation of behavior relies on the processing of feedback we receive. We frequently make decisions under stressful conditions and consequences can occur immedi ately, but actions can have consequences that are delayed by seconds, minutes, or even months. Both factors, stress and the timing of feedback, can influence the learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(149 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the main effects of both waiting time (F (1,20) = 5.422, p = 0.030, η 2 p = 0.213) and feedback (F (1,20) = 5.987, p = 0.024, η 2 p = 0.230) reached a significant level. More concretely, the long waiting time (320.082 ± 74.166 µV 2 ) elicited a larger power than that in the short waiting time (256.219 ± 56.869 µV 2 ); A large power was observed upon gain condition (346.08 ± 84.335 µV 2 ) than lose condition (230.220 ± 48.654 µV 2 ), which is similar with the previous investigations (Zhang et al, 2018;Paul et al, 2019;Höltje & Mecklinger, 2020). Then post-hoc analysis was used for further investigation.…”
Section: Proposed Approach Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the main effects of both waiting time (F (1,20) = 5.422, p = 0.030, η 2 p = 0.213) and feedback (F (1,20) = 5.987, p = 0.024, η 2 p = 0.230) reached a significant level. More concretely, the long waiting time (320.082 ± 74.166 µV 2 ) elicited a larger power than that in the short waiting time (256.219 ± 56.869 µV 2 ); A large power was observed upon gain condition (346.08 ± 84.335 µV 2 ) than lose condition (230.220 ± 48.654 µV 2 ), which is similar with the previous investigations (Zhang et al, 2018;Paul et al, 2019;Höltje & Mecklinger, 2020). Then post-hoc analysis was used for further investigation.…”
Section: Proposed Approach Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3 and 4. For the actual dataset P3-delta results, similar to the results of the time domain in the previous reports (Wu & Zhou, 2009;Zhang et al, 2018;Paul et al, 2019;Höltje & Mecklinger, 2020), the loss condition reflected smaller power than by the gain one. Besides, consistent with the findings in the time domain of the paper (Höltje & Mecklinger, 2020)-that is, the interaction effect between the two factors was significant.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At a first sight, however, some of the extant literature may seem equivocal, possibly due to critical methodological differences related to stress operationalization (Porcelli & Delgado, 2017). A significant number of studies have investigated the effects of stress on learning using different paradigms, such as ACUTE STRESS AND REWARD LEARNING 26 the cold pressor test (Byrne et al, 2019;Ehlers & Todd, 2017;Glienke, Wolf, & Bellebaum, 2015;Lighthall et al, 2013;Otto et al, 2013;Paul, Bellebaum, Ghio, Suchan, & Wolf, 2019) or the Trier social stress test (Boyle, Stanton, Eisenberger, Seeman, & Bower, 2019;Kruse et al, 2018;Petzold et al, 2010;Radenbach et al, 2015), in which acute stress is induced before the learning task. In these paradigms, stress induction precedes any learning processes, thus the stress-induced emotional state may be less concurrent with the cognitive processes that operate during the task.…”
Section: Effect Of Acute Stress On Reward Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P300 amplitude and latency are thought to reflect cognitive processing, such as stimulus identification and evaluation (Feng et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2020;Khedr et al, 2020). Studies have also suggested that higher-order cognitive stimulielicited P300 components are generated from the anterior cortex, and these components reflect the response inhibition process (de Bruijn et al, 2020;Paul et al, 2020). However, Deslandes et al (2006) and Tieges et al (2009) have found no significant alteration of ERP indices or other neuropsychomotor results following caffeine administration after TSD, indicating that there is still a lack of knowledge of caffeine's effects on the human brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%