2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Concentration Factor Evaluation of Offshore Tubular KT Joints Based on Analytical and Numerical Solutions: Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aidibi et al [38] presented a comparative study between Efthymiou's analytical formulations and numerical solutions by finite element analysis (FEA), considering the hot-spot stress approach recommended by IIW, to evaluate the stress concentration factor (SCF) of offshore tubular KT joints. In this research work, the authors concluded that the SCFs estimated by FEA at the crown points of the main chord have shown very high values when compared with DNVGL (Efthymiou's relations).…”
Section: List Of Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aidibi et al [38] presented a comparative study between Efthymiou's analytical formulations and numerical solutions by finite element analysis (FEA), considering the hot-spot stress approach recommended by IIW, to evaluate the stress concentration factor (SCF) of offshore tubular KT joints. In this research work, the authors concluded that the SCFs estimated by FEA at the crown points of the main chord have shown very high values when compared with DNVGL (Efthymiou's relations).…”
Section: List Of Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on elastic and plastic analyses of monopile foundation, Campione [4] proposed a simplified approach to calculate the soil-structure interaction (SSI) of offshore wind tower founded on a monopile member. Aidibi et al [5] investigated the stress concentration of the joints by using analytical calculations and numerical solutions. The results show that the stress concentration factors from the standards are more conservative than those from the finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%