2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(00)00119-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress and failure analysis of mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The large number of variables within any joint design makes it difficult and expensive to test even a small range of joints comprehensively. Therefore many attempts have been made to understand and predict the failure of composite joints [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] using numerical and analytical methods to reduce the experimental effort required. Most successful joint modelling has been conducted with slow design tools, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of variables within any joint design makes it difficult and expensive to test even a small range of joints comprehensively. Therefore many attempts have been made to understand and predict the failure of composite joints [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] using numerical and analytical methods to reduce the experimental effort required. Most successful joint modelling has been conducted with slow design tools, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They range from 2D models with rigid pins representing the bolt [78,105,106], to 3D solid models with or without damage development in the composite [47,52,72,76,80,103,[107][108][109][110][111] and they include parameters such as bolt pretension, bolt clearance, the effect of countersunk/protruding bolt heads, different failure initiation and damage progression models, by-pass loading, implicit/explicit solution methods etc. This work includes solid models of countersunk single-lap joints, cf.…”
Section: Modelling Of Quasi-static Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stresses and strains are computed at each incremental load step and evaluated by the failure criteria to determine the occurrence of failure and the mode of failure. The detailed procedures are reported in reference [9]. The constitutive behavior of the layer, as de- 4), is accessible at every integration point in each element with UMAT.…”
Section: Mpamentioning
confidence: 99%