1990
DOI: 10.5794/jjoms.36.1180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress analysis of the temporomandibular joint by finite element method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the load was 110 N for the deciduous dentition and 140 N for the early mixed dentition (Karibe et al, 1997;Ogata et al, 2001;Tanaka, 1993). The material constants of the bone were a Young's modulus of 10 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3 (Kimura, 1990;Tanaka, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude of the load was 110 N for the deciduous dentition and 140 N for the early mixed dentition (Karibe et al, 1997;Ogata et al, 2001;Tanaka, 1993). The material constants of the bone were a Young's modulus of 10 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3 (Kimura, 1990;Tanaka, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the mechanical effects of stress on bone have been analyzed by finite element analysis of the long bones of the upper and lower extremities, most of which consist of thick cortical bone (Benjamin et al, 2004;Elise et al, 2003;Harun et al, 2003;Taylor et al, 2002;Wirtz et al, 2003). In finite element analysis, the cancellous bone was considered to be no more than bone tissues inside the cortical bone, and assuming that the cancellous bone is a mass, the material constant alone was obtained (Kimura, 1990). However, in the temporomandibular joint with a complicated structure, the cortical bone in the articular eminence is much thinner than that in the limbs bone, and when the cortical bone is stressed, the mechanical properties are markedly affected by the thickness and direction of the cancellous bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, bovines are herbivorous and a grinding jaw movement with mesial and lateral motion is predominant [34], which would probably result in the concentration of greater compressive forces on the central region of the disc [13]. These differences in function and biomechanical environment might affect the phenotypic expression of ECM in the disc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the TMJ facilitates complicated jaw movements, i.e., combination of rotation and translation [1]. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the TMJ is subjected to complicated compressive and tensile forces and that the forces within the TMJ are not evenly distributed [9,13,31]. Second, the TMJ has anatomically complicated structures, such as two bony and cartilaginous components, i.e., glenoid fossa of the temporal bone and mandibular condyle, TMJ disc, peripheral fibrous attachment and ligament [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%