2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Street youth, strain theory, and crime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(152 reference statements)
1
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neighborhood level deprivation is associated with higher levels of crime in the UK, generally, (Coulthard, Walker, & Morgan, 2002), and higher socioeconomic status is associated with greater feelings of neighborhood safety in Ireland, North and South (Balanda and Wilde, 2003). Additionally, research consistently identifies strong links between neighborhood disadvantage and participation in violent and criminal acts (e.g., Baron, 2006;Fergusson, Swain-Campbell, & Horwood, 2004;Rutter et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neighborhood level deprivation is associated with higher levels of crime in the UK, generally, (Coulthard, Walker, & Morgan, 2002), and higher socioeconomic status is associated with greater feelings of neighborhood safety in Ireland, North and South (Balanda and Wilde, 2003). Additionally, research consistently identifies strong links between neighborhood disadvantage and participation in violent and criminal acts (e.g., Baron, 2006;Fergusson, Swain-Campbell, & Horwood, 2004;Rutter et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the non-probability techniques employed and 20% to 50% response range per agency in this study limits generalisability. However, past scholars have noted that a sample of higher risk youth is not amenable to conventional techniques, and findings derived are crucial for exploring whether certain relationships should be revisited and verified in the future (Baron, 2006). Despite these limitations, this study adds important knowledge to the area of drug use within the child welfare arena and in particular, foster youth in the United Kingdom state care system, interview narratives provide a rich account of young people's perceptions about risk, vulnerability and support.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De telles pratiques les mettent un peu plus encore au ban de la société et rendent plus difficile encore leur intégration, déjà compromise par des problématiques telles que les addictions et les maladies, physiques et mentales, mais aussi la présence répétée de l'intervention pénale dans leur vie (Novac et al, 2002 ;Durham, 2003 ;Hughes et al, 2005 ;Karabanow et al, 2005 ;Karabanow, 2006Karabanow, , 2008Karabanow et al, 2007). L'engagement des jeunes de la rue dans l'économie informelle est trop souvent discuté dans son seul rapport avec les économies des activités criminelles (trafic de drogue, commerce du sexe, vols) (Hagan et McCarthy, 1997 ;Baron, 2004). Ce faisant, la perception commune et stigmatisante que l'activité criminelle est le seul ou en tout cas le premier moyen de subsistance pour la plupart des jeunes sans-abri, sinon pour tous, se renforce.…”
Section: L'économie Informelle Et Les Expériences De Vie Des Jeunes Dunclassified