1999
DOI: 10.2307/3237145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream power influence on southern Californian riparian vegetation

Abstract: Abstract. Mechanical damage by floodwaters is frequently invoked to explain the distribution of riparian plant species, but data have been lacking to relate vegetation to specific estimates of flood damage potential. This research uses detailed estimates of unit stream power (an appropriate measure of the potential for mechanical damage) in conjunction with vegetation cover data to test this relationship at 37 valley‐bottom sites in the Transverse Ranges of Southern California. A computer program, HEC‐2, was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local-scale flooding and sediment deposition also contribute nutrients to riparian soils and facilitate the dispersion of riparian propagules (Nilsson and others 1991;Andersson and others 2000). In contrast, infrequent floods of high intensity or duration may denude large areas of riparian vegetation by dislodging or burying plants (Bendix 1999), or by creating anaerobic soil conditions (Blom and Voesenek 1996;Friedman and Auble 1999). Because floatway structures shield riparian plant communities from all but the most infrequent, catastrophic floods, their removal is expected to result in more frequent but less intense disturbance and correspondingly enhanced species richness.…”
Section: Responses Of Riparian Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local-scale flooding and sediment deposition also contribute nutrients to riparian soils and facilitate the dispersion of riparian propagules (Nilsson and others 1991;Andersson and others 2000). In contrast, infrequent floods of high intensity or duration may denude large areas of riparian vegetation by dislodging or burying plants (Bendix 1999), or by creating anaerobic soil conditions (Blom and Voesenek 1996;Friedman and Auble 1999). Because floatway structures shield riparian plant communities from all but the most infrequent, catastrophic floods, their removal is expected to result in more frequent but less intense disturbance and correspondingly enhanced species richness.…”
Section: Responses Of Riparian Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lichvar and Wakeley 2004) to those that are influenced by the local landscape, which may vary laterally with distance from the center of the channel (lateral gradients in inundation duration and frequency, floodwater depth, etc.) (Stromberg 1993, 1998, Auble et al 1994, Stromberg et al 1996, Bendix 1999. Additionally, riparian plant community arrangements and distributions are controlled by local moisture availability and elevation, which are associated with increased precipitation, a higher abundance of vegetation, and the selection of certain assemblages and species (Lichvar and Wakeley 2004).…”
Section: Ohwm Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent low-intensity floods limit competitive exclusion by dominant species and create open patches for colonization by opportunistic species Grelsson 1990, Auble andScott 1998). In contrast, infrequent floods of high intensity or duration may denude large areas of riparian vegetation by dislodging or burying plants (Bendix 1999) or by creating anaerobic soil conditions (Blom andVoesenek 1996, Friedman andAuble 1999). Local-scale flooding and sediment deposition also affect soil composition and nutrient dynamics (Richards 1982, Naiman and De´-camps 1997) and facilitate the dispersion of riparian propagules (Nilsson et al 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%