2017
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2017001000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straw production and agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with forage species in no-tillage system

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the straw production and the agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with oversown forage species, in no-tillage system. A randomized complete block design was carried out with four replicates, in a 5×2+2 factorial arrangement, as follows: five forage species -Urochloa brizantha 'Marandu', Urochloa ruziziensis, Panicum maximum 'Mombaça', Panicum maximum 'Massai', and Pennisetum americanum -, intercropped with soybean over two crop years (2013/2014 and 2014/2015… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Millet is one of the most cover crop used in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Millet vigorous initial growth can be an important forage to anticipate animal stocking compared to perennial forages, once Millet is prompt to be grazed in 30 days after seeds emergence while the other forages in this study takes at least 45 days after seeds emergence (Machado & Assis, 2010;Andrade et al, 2017). Based on the inherent differences among Millet and perennial forages investigated, lower Millet DM compared to Soybean+P.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Millet is one of the most cover crop used in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Millet vigorous initial growth can be an important forage to anticipate animal stocking compared to perennial forages, once Millet is prompt to be grazed in 30 days after seeds emergence while the other forages in this study takes at least 45 days after seeds emergence (Machado & Assis, 2010;Andrade et al, 2017). Based on the inherent differences among Millet and perennial forages investigated, lower Millet DM compared to Soybean+P.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The plots were stablished in 2012 in Oxisol with a medium texture (EMBRAPA, 2014). Detail of the experiment implementation is detailed described in (Andrade et al, 2017). The area was under degraded pasture for 15 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of difference at this initial moment of establishment of the Sm, SMh and SMRh systems was expected, due to procedures of soil tillage and initial conditioning of fertility. Thus, the 'constructed' fertility nullified possible effects of the intensification process, which until then was restricted to the increase in maintenance fertilizer (Figure 2), considering that the ruzigrass oversown in the soybean maturation stage has no interference in the yield of the respective harvest (ANDRADE et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intensification involved species diversification and two levels of investment in the maintenance fertilizer (Figure 2). The treatments were formed as follows: System 1 -Soybean monocropping with medium investment in fertilizer (Sm); System 2 -Maize monocropping with medium investment (Mm); System 3 - In the systems with inclusion of ruzigrass, the grass seeds were distributed mixed to the fertilizer in the sowing furrow of maize and broadcast during the reproductive stage of soybean (phenological stage R5.5), according to Andrade et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies must be created to increase the efficiency of P availability in the soil and reduce strong dependence on imported phosphate fertilizers. One noteworthy alternative is reuse of P from livestock residues associated with conservationist systems, such as the integrated crop-livestock (iCL) system, which can further enhance the efficiency of P availability in the soil (Crusciol et al, 2015;Andrade et al, 2017;Prochnow et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%