1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl01196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratospheric NO and NO2 abundances from ATMOS Solar‐Occultation Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the HALOE retrievals include corrections for diurnal variations along the line of sight, whereas the SAGE III and POAM III retrievals do not. This could be one explanation for the differences below 25 km (see Newchurch et al, 1996).…”
Section: Haloe Sage II Sage Iii and Poam Iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the HALOE retrievals include corrections for diurnal variations along the line of sight, whereas the SAGE III and POAM III retrievals do not. This could be one explanation for the differences below 25 km (see Newchurch et al, 1996).…”
Section: Haloe Sage II Sage Iii and Poam Iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACE mission builds on the heritage of a number of previous solar occultation missions, including the Atmospheric Trace MOlecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) instrument Newchurch et al, 1996;Manney et al, 1999), which flew on four Space Shuttle flights between 1985 and 1994. The three Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment instruments, SAGE I McCormick, 1979, 1986), SAGE II (Mauldin et al, 1985) and SAGE III (SAGE ATBD Team, 2002) all used ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) solar occultation to measure NO 2 , as did the second Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM II) (Glaccum et al, 1996) and POAM III (Lucke et al, 1999;Randall et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish et al, 1995;Hendrick et al, 2006McLinden et al, 2006Newchurch et al, 1996). The diurnal effect is a result of sunlight passing through a range of SZAs, and hence sampling NO 2 at different points in its diurnal cycle, on its way through the atmosphere to the instrument.…”
Section: Ozonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below 25 km, vertical VMR profiles uncorrected for this effect can be in error by 20% for NO 2 and more than 100% for NO. 16 Diurnal corrections for ATMOS Version 2 NO and NO 2 are discussed in Ref. 16, and for Version 3 we use a similar procedure described in Ref.…”
Section: E Diurnal Corrections For No and Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Diurnal corrections for ATMOS Version 2 NO and NO 2 are discussed in Ref. 16, and for Version 3 we use a similar procedure described in Ref. 17.…”
Section: E Diurnal Corrections For No and Nomentioning
confidence: 99%