2020
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic hierarchy and three‐dimensional evolution of an exhumed submarine slope channel system

Abstract: Submarine slope channel systems have complicated three‐dimensional geometries and facies distributions, which are challenging to resolve using subsurface data. Outcrop analogues can provide sub‐seismic‐scale detail, although most exhumed systems only afford two‐dimensional constraints on the depositional architecture. A rare example of an accessible fine‐grained slope channel complex set situated in a tectonically quiescent basin that offers seismic‐scale, down‐dip and across‐strike exposures is the Klein Hang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has constrained the palaeogeographic context of the study area where there is a downdip architectural change from submarine channel complexes 25 km south of the study area (e.g. Wild et al, 2005;Bell et al, 2020) to lobe-dominated deposits mapped southwest of Skoorsteenberg (Hofstra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Depositional Environment Of Lower Heterolithics-prone Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work has constrained the palaeogeographic context of the study area where there is a downdip architectural change from submarine channel complexes 25 km south of the study area (e.g. Wild et al, 2005;Bell et al, 2020) to lobe-dominated deposits mapped southwest of Skoorsteenberg (Hofstra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Depositional Environment Of Lower Heterolithics-prone Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional mapping of an overlying 12 m thick mudstone that correlated these sand-prone units led to the redefinition of Unit 5 (Wild et al, 2009). In proximal (southern) areas of Unit 5 at Kleine Hangklip, stacked W-E and SW-NE orientated submarine slope channel complexes have been interpreted (Wild et al, 2005;Bell et al, 2020) that overlie the updip pinchout of Fans three and 4 (Hansen et al, 2019). In distal (northern) areas of Unit 5 submarine fan deposits have been mapped southeast of the study area at Blaukop, where sand-rich channel-fills incise into proximal lobes (Hofstra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has constrained the palaeogeographic context of the study area where there is a down-dip architectural change from submarine channel complexes 25 km south of the study area (e.g. Bell et al, 2020;Wild et al, 2005) to lobe-dominated deposits mapped southwest of Skoorsteenberg (Hofstra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion 71 Depositional Environment Of Lower Heterolithics-prone Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional mapping of an overlying 12 m thick mudstone that correlated these sand-prone units led to the redefinition of Unit 5 (Wild et al, 2009). In proximal (southern) areas of Unit 5 at Kleine Hangklip, stacked W-E and SW-NE orientated submarine slope channel complexes have been interpreted (Bell et al, 2020;Wild et al, 2005) that overlie the updip pinchout of Fans 3 and 4 (Hansen et al, 2019). In distal (northern) areas of Unit 5 submarine fan deposits have been mapped southeast of the study area at Blaukop, where sand-rich channel-fills incise into proximal lobes (Hofstra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, outcrops are often non‐continuous, variably accessible, and limited to perspectives afforded by exposure orientation relative to depositional dip. Consequently, models of submarine channel evolution have primarily developed from limited views along depositional strike‐oriented perspectives (e.g., Figure 1B; Covault et al, 2016), while the variability of facies and stratigraphic architecture along depositional dip is rarely addressed (Bell et al, 2020; Malkowski et al, 2018; Plink‐Björklund et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%