Strategy, Performance Evaluation and Process Management in Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

The processes of Strategic Planning (SP), Performance Evaluation (PE) and Process Management (PM) for Higher EducationInstitutions (HEI) are considered more, than ever, urgent and necessary, acting as factors of motivation, awareness and exploratory data collection. The objective of this paper is to identify positive and negative aspects involved in realization of SP, PE and PM in HEI, through a literature review in online data bases, which allowed to conduct an exploratory and descriptive study. It was seen that HEI are considered complex systems in which results has implications on SP, PE and PM execution. During the literature review process, some barriers have been identified for its implementation, such as decentralization, departments autonomy, heterogeneity in the departments operation, data stored in places that cannot be accessed by everybody, bureaucracy, change resistance, dissociation between planning and management, as participation lack of university community in planning process. 363 INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION (IJM&P)http://www. ijmp.jor.br v. 8, n. 2, April -June 2017 ISSN: 2236 However, there were also found ways to overcome these barriers using mainly the organizational commitment among high management, clear strategy, wide communication and also through the participation of all stakeholders.

Innovative university: evidence from university management

“…Thus, we highlight that the university management of the HEI is engaged in the constant advance of promoting its innovation (Da Silva et al, 2017). To this end, instruments that can measure innovation are used (Kowang et al, 2015).…”

“…Based on this challenge, we aim to identify evidence that can characterize an innovative university based on its university management. Our main contributions are to identify the relationship between university management and the promotion of innovation of an HEI (Da Silva et al. , 2017).…”

Strategic Planning Pitfalls in Society 5.0: A Systematic Literature Review

“…Also, created the construction of a system of incentive and control to restrict innovation and employees' affecting negatively exploitation-exploration balance (Ibid, 2020). Silva (2020) contributes to the literature review with barriers regarding the bureaucracy, the change in resistance, profound disassociation between planning and management, and the inability to access data due to not being available to everybody. People can be replaced by systems, lack of support of top management, and the organization is not the propensity to planning.…”

Pós-Nova Gestão Pública No Planejamento Estratégico Da Educação Profissional Brasileira

“…A literatura tem sugerido resultados pouco satisfatórios quanto ao PDI de organizações acadêmicas. Evidências apontam o PDI como: um instrumento cumpridor de requisitos legais, burocráticos e de uso não gerencial (MIZAEL et al, 2013); um documento descritivo de imposição legal para legitimidade entre os atores, cujas missões são vagas e intangíveis (LIMA et al, 2020); um instrumento de controle e de poder de poucos grupos (ALMEIDA; GIROGI, 2013); gerador de conflitos e tensões, que provoca ausência de sintonia entre o planejado e o executado (FALQUETO et al, 2019;MEYER JUNIOR;PASCUCI;MEYER, 2018); pouco transparente (DAL MAGRO; RAUSCH, 2012); e pouco democrático (FERREIRA; COELHO, 2020;MIZAEL et al, 2012;SILVA;VIEIRA;SILVA, 2017).…”