Strategy development using TOWS matrix for international project risk management based on prioritization of risk categories

Abstract

Purpose International projects very commonly experience failure due to various factors at the global level. Especially, large projects at the international level virtually have no chance of meeting scope, time, cost and quality. This fact has been underlined by most of the international surveys and published literature. Effective risk management plays a vital role in preventing projects from failure by implementing appropriate risk response strategies. The success of risk management will be based on the understanding of various risk categories which specifically affect international projects, analysis of their interdependence, prioritize them according to their importance and develop strategies for risk management based on the prioritization. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper represents typical eight risk categories frequently observed in the international projects through literature survey and feedback from project professionals. Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and Matrice d’Impacts croises-multiplication applique´ an classment (MICMAC) analysis have been used to analyze the interactions among the risk categories and prioritize them. The strategy management tool threats, opportunities, weaknesses and strengths (TOWS) matrix has been used to develop the strategies for effective project risk management. Findings The analysis represents political risks, contractual and legal risks, cultural risks, and financial and economic risks as the highest priority risk categories, the mitigation of which should be paid the highest attention. The strengths-threats strategy has been applied to develop the strategies by identifying the various internal strengths of project organization to overcome the various threats caused by the eight risk categories observed in international projects. Research limitations/implications This paper tries to represent the prioritization of international project risk categories which are generic in nature. For any specific international project, the risk categories as well as their prioritization may be slightly varying. The tool used for prioritization; Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is more suitable for few numbers of variables as it becomes complex as the number of variables increases. The strengths and threats considered for developing strategies using TOWS matrix are based on the feedback from project professionals and may vary according to the nature of project. Originality/value This paper uses ISM and MICMAC for risk prioritization in international projects and TOWS matrix for developing risk management strategies. This may trigger new opportunities for in-depth research in the risk management strategy development for international projects.

Stakeholders' involvement in green supply chain: a perspective of blockchain IoT-integrated architecture

“…Motivating and engaging employees in green initiatives results in improved performance and higher customer satisfaction (Srivastava and Shree, 2019; Zaid et al , 2018). Management support and rewards to the employees (Dandage et al , 2019; Guerci et al , 2016) for their initiatives in reducing pollution or waste management motivates them further to participate in trainings and take new initiatives for geen upply chain. Success of engaging employees in green initiatives depends majorly on the skills of employees and their willingness to work for new designs and products considering environment impacts (Sancha et al , 2016, Kumar and Rahman, 2015).…”

Fundamental elements regarding the approach of risk management within the international projects with teams in the virtual environment

“…The bibliographic research in the field of risk management in international projects and teams in the virtual environment revealed that the research undertaken was very scarce [7] and focused on specific phases of the risk management process, mainly, on identifying and analyzing risks in international projects [4,28] especially those in the field of construction [8,15,30,31,32] or within dispersed teams in software projects [11,29,33,34,35] and to a very small extent, virtual project teams [18,36].…”

“…International projects very often face failure due to different and complex factors globally. In particular, large international projects are very unlikely to meet the scope, time, cost and quality [4]. Hubbard [5] (p. 7) claims that the ultimate common mode failure would be a failure of the risk management process itself.…”

“…Hubbard [5] (p. 7) claims that the ultimate common mode failure would be a failure of the risk management process itself. Thus, effective risk management plays a vital role in preventing projects from failure [4] by identifiyng the most useful approach taking into account the specific features of international projects, which differentiate them from traditional ones, in order to implement appropriate risk response strategies. IPTVE, in particular, as a result of their complexity and fast pace of development [6] are threatened by numerous types of risks [7] which may represent consequences of their internal and external environment characteristics, which are constantly changing [1].…”

Data-driven fleet management using MOORA: a perspective of risk management

“…Kirkire et al (2018) implemented PRM practices in a dental-product-manufacturing company for MPD. (Dandage et al , 2019) used interpretive structural modeling and Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliqués à un Classement for risk prioritization in international projects. Rane et al (2019) developed a PRM framework based on Industry 4.0 technologies and demonstrated the developed framework using IoT technology.…”