2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies to avoid blacklisting: The case of statistics on money laundering

Abstract: Financial and legal entities (e.g. banks, casinos, notaries etc.) have to report money laundering suspicions. Countries’ engagement in fighting money laundering is evaluated–among others–with statistics on how often these suspicions are reported. Lack of compliance can result in economically harmful blacklisting. Nevertheless, these blacklists repeatedly become empty–in what is known as the emptying blacklist paradox. We develop a principal-agent model with intermediate agents and show that non-harmonized stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the author points out that some of the most prominent uses of the blacklist were in the fight against banking secrecy and non-proliferation. In this regard, blacklists are used for various purposes, as an instrument to prevent money laundering (Ferwerda et al, 2019); online fraud; corruption and crime (Jacobs & Anechiarico, 1992); tax evasion (Kostić et al, 2017), and others. Furthermore, it is important to note that there are different mechanisms that can be used on the blacklist, and as a result there will be some direct and indirect costs associated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the author points out that some of the most prominent uses of the blacklist were in the fight against banking secrecy and non-proliferation. In this regard, blacklists are used for various purposes, as an instrument to prevent money laundering (Ferwerda et al, 2019); online fraud; corruption and crime (Jacobs & Anechiarico, 1992); tax evasion (Kostić et al, 2017), and others. Furthermore, it is important to note that there are different mechanisms that can be used on the blacklist, and as a result there will be some direct and indirect costs associated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every country is now working assiduously on all fronts of the regulatory environment of their financial systems in order not to be blacklisted by FATF. This pressure to stay afloat is strengthening the financial systems in countries, and thus, the overall international financial system is gaining ground (Eggenberger, 2018; Ferwerda et al , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pakistan was first evaluated in 2005 by financial action task force (FATF) and since then struggling to secure a stable position with FATF due to multiple issues, including political instability, poor development of related laws, lack of capacity of LEAs, and financial structure. As a result, FATF placed Pakistan in its gray list for the first time in February 2008 and remain listed till 2011 (Ferwerda et al, 2019), again in 2012, Pakistan was listed and remained there till 2015, and in June 2018, placed in the list for the third time (Rubab, 2018). Pakistan is still on the gray list of FATF for non‐compliance with FATF recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%