2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1855-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for patient profiling in articular cartilage repair of the knee: a prospective cohort of patients treated by one experienced cartilage surgeon

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcome of a large heterogenic cartilage repair population treated with the profiling strategies of one experienced cartilage surgeon to provide evidence based tools for treatment selection in a clinical environment.MethodsA total of 216 patients were identified in this prospective single-surgeon study. For the primary and secondary treatment of smaller defects, microfracture (MF) was used. Hyalograft C was used for first and second line larger def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,24,26,37,45,55 As such, surgeons mainly rely on expertise when interpreting an MRI scan after cartilage repair. 9 This systematic review sought to evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair to elucidate the inconsistency in the literature and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. A systematic search of the MED-LINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration databases resulted in a total of 32 studies after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,24,26,37,45,55 As such, surgeons mainly rely on expertise when interpreting an MRI scan after cartilage repair. 9 This systematic review sought to evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair to elucidate the inconsistency in the literature and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. A systematic search of the MED-LINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration databases resulted in a total of 32 studies after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly available treatments to enhance the quality of repair of symptomatic deep cartilage and osteochondral lesions include: 1) bone marrow stimulation (microfractures, MF) (Mithoefer et al, 2005); 2) osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) (Bobic, 1999) (Gudas et al, 2012); and 3) autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) (Peterson et al, 2010). MF and single-plug OAT are usually implemented for small chondral and osteochondral defects (< 1-2 cm 2 ), while for larger lesions, multiple OAT and ACI are both preferable treatment options (Bekkers et al, 2009;De Windt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study (de Windt et al. 2012), carbon fiber implants were used for salvage cases with degenerative joints treated arthroscopically, and there were statistically significant clinical improvements at 3 years after surgery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%