2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10430-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for enhancing gene expression in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kondo et al . six described six genetics elements of E. coli which contribute to an increased gene expression levels and result in higher yields of the desired protein, namely: promoter, translation enhancer, Shine‐Dalgarno sequence, spacer, encoding gene, and terminator of the gene [48] . Our results additionally demonstrated that the presence of a terminator region along with the “Best” enhancer fragment can result in further improvement of secretion through the Hly secretion system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Kondo et al . six described six genetics elements of E. coli which contribute to an increased gene expression levels and result in higher yields of the desired protein, namely: promoter, translation enhancer, Shine‐Dalgarno sequence, spacer, encoding gene, and terminator of the gene [48] . Our results additionally demonstrated that the presence of a terminator region along with the “Best” enhancer fragment can result in further improvement of secretion through the Hly secretion system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…15−17 Specifically, the 48 bp insertion disrupts the translation enhancer sequence located between the RBS and the promoter that is involved in ribosome interactions and mRNA stabilization (Figure S1A). 16,17 The source of the insertion was the pUC57-Kan vector (Genscript) in which the cap BGC had been cloned after synthesis. 7 The 48 bp insertion consists of inverted sequence repeats originating from the pUC57-Kan cloning vector (Figure S1B), which are not present in pSK020 from the overproducer.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole-plasmid sequencing of the pSK020 plasmid harboring the cap BGC revealed a 48 bp insertion between the ribosome binding site (RBS) and the −10 and −35 promoter regions in the low-producer pSK020 plasmid (hereafter termed “pSK020 + 48”), whereas pSK020 from the overproducer was as designed without the insertion. The 48 bp insertion increases the distance between the P BAD promoter and the RBS and alters the sequence context for transcription and translation initiation, which is known to affect gene expression and subsequent production yield. Specifically, the 48 bp insertion disrupts the translation enhancer sequence located between the RBS and the promoter that is involved in ribosome interactions and mRNA stabilization (Figure S1A). , The source of the insertion was the pUC57-Kan vector (Genscript) in which the cap BGC had been cloned after synthesis .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the synthesis of bioactive nanomaterials, it is realized by edition and modification of genome of E. coli by exogenous editing plasmid, thus developing a system suitable for the efficient synthesis of bioactive nanomaterials in E. coli in large scale, which is considered as the most promising microbe factory for further industrial and commercial application. [ 147 ]…”
Section: Genetic Manipulation Technology For Synthesis Of Bc‐based Ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%