The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3174081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for Engaging Communities in Creating Physical Civic Technologies

Abstract: Despite widespread interest in civic technologies, empowering neighbourhoods to take advantage of these technologies in their local area remains challenging. This paper presents findings from the Ardler Inventors project, which aimed to understand how neighbourhoods can be supported in performing roles normally carried out by researchers and designers. We describe the end-to-end process of bringing people together around technology, designing and prototyping ideas, and ultimately testing several devices in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of hackathons also varies greatly. Hackathons typically run continuously over 24–36 hours, but may also run for shorter periods of time over a span of weeks, months or even years (Truyen 2016; Taes & Colangelo 2017; Hölttä-Otto et al 2018; Rennick et al 2018; Taylor et al 2018; De Oliveira et al 2019; Richterich 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of hackathons also varies greatly. Hackathons typically run continuously over 24–36 hours, but may also run for shorter periods of time over a span of weeks, months or even years (Truyen 2016; Taes & Colangelo 2017; Hölttä-Otto et al 2018; Rennick et al 2018; Taylor et al 2018; De Oliveira et al 2019; Richterich 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizens who take part in the neighbourhood become active and engaged [39], build trust towards governmental actors [40,41], and feel more at home in their neighbourhood [42]. As policymakers have started to recognise the benefits of citizens' contribution to the liveability and safety of the city [43], increasingly, policies are adopted to empower citizens to take responsibility for their neighbourhood [44].…”
Section: Citizen Participation and Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question is to what extent governments are the appropriate stakeholder to determine which technology is necessary in the smart city, since citizens might lack accessibility to it, as well as a lacking opportunity for citizens to have an influence on its design and outcome [44,63,64]. Other papers (e.g.…”
Section: Playgrounds In the Smart Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to improve the liveability of local neighbourhoods is for urban designers and city planners to encourage citizens to take responsibility for their neighbourhood and actively participate in local activities (Comes 2016;Meerow, Newell, and Stults 2016). Local governments have started to experiment with public participation policies to prompt such citizen engagement (Seyfang and Smith 2007;Taylor et al 2018). The ultimate aim for cities is to increase social resilience and improve social cohesion within their neighbourhoods Manturuk, Lindblad, and Quercia 2012;Hampton and Wellman 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%