2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-013-0725-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic voting and nomination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem that often arises in GDSS is how to aggregate the opinion of decision-makers to gain an appropriate decision [44]- [46], so that decision making can produce policies for the development of tourism in Bali. One of the group decision methods is Borda, which is a voting method that can resolve group decision making, where each decision-maker gives a rating based on alternative options available [47]- [49], with the first alternative getting the highest value and the last alternative getting the lowest value, one. The implementation of the BORDA method is described in Table VI [48], the highest value is the first alternative decision.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem that often arises in GDSS is how to aggregate the opinion of decision-makers to gain an appropriate decision [44]- [46], so that decision making can produce policies for the development of tourism in Bali. One of the group decision methods is Borda, which is a voting method that can resolve group decision making, where each decision-maker gives a rating based on alternative options available [47]- [49], with the first alternative getting the highest value and the last alternative getting the lowest value, one. The implementation of the BORDA method is described in Table VI [48], the highest value is the first alternative decision.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%