2018
DOI: 10.3390/socsci7020020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Self-Presentation of Women in STEM

Abstract: Despite a plethora of initiatives and a surge of research activity, women remain under-represented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines (National Science Foundation 2017). While much research has focused on ways to recruit women into these disciplines, less work has explored the strategies women use to navigate these contexts once they have entered. In a set of two experimental studies, we investigate women's potential response strategies to the well-documented tension betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And she may have felt the press of negative stereotypes in taking a difficult math or technical test, aware that a poor score could confirm a negative stereotype in the minds of other people about women’s abilities (Spencer et al, 1999). These concerns may be compounded by artifacts the woman sees in technology settings that imply that the typical technology worker is a geeky man (Cheryan et al, 2009), implying that she may need to hide aspects of her gender identity (Garr-Schultz & Gardner, 2018; Pronin et al, 2004) or otherwise contort herself to fit a masculine default to be taken seriously (Cheryan & Markus, 2020).…”
Section: Microinclusions and Gender In Technology Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And she may have felt the press of negative stereotypes in taking a difficult math or technical test, aware that a poor score could confirm a negative stereotype in the minds of other people about women’s abilities (Spencer et al, 1999). These concerns may be compounded by artifacts the woman sees in technology settings that imply that the typical technology worker is a geeky man (Cheryan et al, 2009), implying that she may need to hide aspects of her gender identity (Garr-Schultz & Gardner, 2018; Pronin et al, 2004) or otherwise contort herself to fit a masculine default to be taken seriously (Cheryan & Markus, 2020).…”
Section: Microinclusions and Gender In Technology Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a dearth of research on the influence of both traditional and social media experiences on STEM identity development [see Steinke, 2017]. In addition, social media may be a site where content creators who identify as women in STEM actively negotiate their gender identity and STEM identity when they perceive conflict [Settles, 2004] and tension [Garr-Schultz & Gardner, 2018] between two social identities that are linked to traditional gender-STEM stereotypes. In fact, recent research has emphasized that visual narratives crafted by women in STEM on social media can be powerful in challenging outdated, sexist assumptions and attitudes about women in STEM [Wells, 2023] as well as crucial for advocating for social change in STEM [Yammine et al, 2018].…”
Section: Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle) [12] imagery combined with machine learning algorithms has shown excellent potential for rapid, remote, cost-effective detection tasks. This approach allows ice identification from multiple views with an automatic check-up operation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%