The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2000.tb00248.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Alliance Success Factors

Abstract: SUMMARY There is recognition that competition is shifting from a “firm versus firm perspective” to a “supply chain versus supply chain perspective.” In response to this shift, firms seeking competitive advantage are participating in cooperative supply chain arrangements, such as strategic alliances, which combine their individual strengths and unique resources. Buyer‐supplier sourcing relationships are a primary focus of alliance improvement efforts. While interest in such arrangements remains strong, it is we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
234
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
234
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…initiating cooperation and favouring new cooperative initiatives. A sustainable logistics initiative can play the role of a pilot activity as it has a peculiar strength point: it allows overcoming one of the main reasons for the failure of SCM initiatives, which is risk and gain sharing (Whipple and Frankel, 2000). When the major aim of cooperation is, for example, to reduce CO2 emissions or to optimise load factor, in order to comply with new regulation or to reduce the delivery cost, the possibility for developing a successful collaboration becomes higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…initiating cooperation and favouring new cooperative initiatives. A sustainable logistics initiative can play the role of a pilot activity as it has a peculiar strength point: it allows overcoming one of the main reasons for the failure of SCM initiatives, which is risk and gain sharing (Whipple and Frankel, 2000). When the major aim of cooperation is, for example, to reduce CO2 emissions or to optimise load factor, in order to comply with new regulation or to reduce the delivery cost, the possibility for developing a successful collaboration becomes higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, social capital, accumulated by frequent communication, timely information sharing, shared problem solving and good relationships, provide opportunities to improve operational performance [97,98].…”
Section: Social Capital On Operational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to different theoretical backgrounds, the contributions of the studies analyzing interfirm antecedents of alliance performance center around critical success factors for managing alliances (e.g. Killing, 1983;Harrigan, 1986;Pekar and Allio, 1994;Dussauge and Garrette, 1995;Douma, 1997;Whipple and Frankel, 2000). In general, studies of this type suggest a set of success factors that considerably influence the performance of the dyadic relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%