2003
DOI: 10.1080/0268396032000122132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Alignment and Enterprise Systems Implementation: The Case of Metalco

Abstract: This paper explores the issue of strategic alignment and enterprise systems (ES) implementation from the point of view of one organization involved in deploying an enterprise resource planning system globally. Two questions motivated this research. First, given that strategic information systems (IS) alignment is viewed as essential to organizational success in deriving value from information technology (IT) investments, what is the experience of organizations in practice in aligning their IT strategies with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The responsibility for identifying, orchestrating and managing the organizational changes associated with an IS implementation effort rests with the organization's managers (Grant, 2003;Leonard-Barton, 1988;Sharma & Yetton, 2003). As the extent of organizational change increases, organizations need to deploy more managerial and enduser resources to undertake these changes successfully, thus incurring greater implementation costs (Zmud & Cox, 1979).…”
Section: A Configuration-based Perspective On Is Implementation Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responsibility for identifying, orchestrating and managing the organizational changes associated with an IS implementation effort rests with the organization's managers (Grant, 2003;Leonard-Barton, 1988;Sharma & Yetton, 2003). As the extent of organizational change increases, organizations need to deploy more managerial and enduser resources to undertake these changes successfully, thus incurring greater implementation costs (Zmud & Cox, 1979).…”
Section: A Configuration-based Perspective On Is Implementation Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have found that IT alignment continuously varies with changes in the environment, strategy, organization structure, or technology itself. Therefore, achieving and sustaining strategic alignment is difficult and often frustrating (Grant, 2003;Sabherwal, Hirschheim, & Goles, 2001).…”
Section: Toward a Process Model Of Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little evidence exists supporting this kind of reasoning as analytical tasks are mostly carried out by individual informal decisions that may not be carefully linked to relevant business objectives (Gunasekaran and Kobu, 2002). Many failed cases involve systems deployment primarily designed for solving functional and technical problems, without considering the implications for organizational changes engendered during the adoption procedures (Grant, 2003). Successful cases are associated with detailed corporate analyses of the internal operations to establish relationships with their external organizations in order to identify supply/demand fluctuations and amplitudes (Kumar, et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%