2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-rate dependence of surface/subsurface deformation mechanisms during nanoscratching tests of GGG single crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 b–d, Figure 4 b–d, Figure 5 b–d and Figure 6 b–d are detailed enlarged views of the micro damage shown in the dashed boxed areas. Comparing these pictures, it is found that the scratch groove shown in Figure 3 a has obvious tortuous features and the scratch direction has changed many times, which is not as straight as the single crystal material [ 30 ]. The scratch direction change indicates that the indenter has slipped.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 b–d, Figure 4 b–d, Figure 5 b–d and Figure 6 b–d are detailed enlarged views of the micro damage shown in the dashed boxed areas. Comparing these pictures, it is found that the scratch groove shown in Figure 3 a has obvious tortuous features and the scratch direction has changed many times, which is not as straight as the single crystal material [ 30 ]. The scratch direction change indicates that the indenter has slipped.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nanoscratching test, the scratch directions for Berkovich indenter include the edge-forward mode, the side-face forward mode, and the face-forward mode [ 34 ]. The existing model for predicting the penetration depth taking strain rate into account was only in the face-forward mode [ 30 ]. In our study, we adopted the edge forward mode, as shown in Figure 1 , which greatly reduced the influence of the indenter spherical tip on the scratch direction change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under the higher normal load of 20 mN, the differences in size and morphology of wear debris were more distinct, shown in Figure 6.24. The wear debris changed from ductile chips to brittle chips generated by crack propagation [201]. In 1 rGO + 1 CNT composite, large rGO and CNT were observed in wear debris.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%