2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain energy density as a rupture criterion for the kidney: impact tests on porcine organs, finite element simulation, and a baseline comparison between human and porcine tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all the studied strains, energy and pressure, 0.265 MPS, 0.281 MSS, and 1.72E−6 (J/mm 3 ) SED were found to be appropriate to predict the contusion volume with minimum residual error. Snedeker et al [32] used SED to predict the rupture of kidney. Shreiber et al [14] investigated stresses besides strains and SED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the studied strains, energy and pressure, 0.265 MPS, 0.281 MSS, and 1.72E−6 (J/mm 3 ) SED were found to be appropriate to predict the contusion volume with minimum residual error. Snedeker et al [32] used SED to predict the rupture of kidney. Shreiber et al [14] investigated stresses besides strains and SED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average contact pressures were calculated by dividing the cumulative normal force (element contact stress multiplied by element area) for elements in contact by the total contact area as described above. Peak pressures were calculated from elements sharing the node with highest normal contact force (the cumulative normal force divided by the cumulative area of the elements 23 ).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain, for example, has a Young modulus of several hundred pascals, whereas that of muscle lies above 10 kPa. Tissue from kidney has a value around 100 kPa and that of tendon and cartilage is in the range of megapascals (Levental et al, 2007;Georges et al, 2006;Snedeker et al, 2005;Discher et al, 2005). Only recently have proposals been made for more compliant materials that have tunable elasticity values that are comparable to living tissue.…”
Section: Selective and Uncoupled Role Of Substrate Elasticity In The mentioning
confidence: 99%