2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2952034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain distribution in Zr64.13Cu15.75Ni10.12Al10 bulk metallic glass investigated by in situ tensile tests under synchrotron radiation

Abstract: We report on the evolution of the atomic-scale strain tensor of ductile Zr64.13Cu15.75Ni10.12Al10 bulk metallic glass under tensile loading by using x-ray synchrotron radiation. The same kind of samples was previously investigated under compressive loading and revealed yielding at 1690 MPa together with large deformability of up to 160% strain. In tension the samples fracture at a lower stress, 1500 MPa, with no sign of yielding or plastic deformation. With no macroplasticity observed under tension, large diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular they found that the strains at short distances are smaller than those at large distances. Similar results were obtained by several groups [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and it is clear that such inhomogeneous response is a common feature of elasticity in metallic glasses, distinct from those of crystalline solids. There is, however, a minor problem before we discuss the implications of these results.…”
Section: Anisotropic Pdfsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular they found that the strains at short distances are smaller than those at large distances. Similar results were obtained by several groups [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and it is clear that such inhomogeneous response is a common feature of elasticity in metallic glasses, distinct from those of crystalline solids. There is, however, a minor problem before we discuss the implications of these results.…”
Section: Anisotropic Pdfsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A majority of researchers interpret these results in terms of distance-dependent strain [28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37][38][39] or chemical inhomogeneity [34]. The strain is small at short distances, and increases as r is increased.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are consistent with earlier observations (by our group and others) on samples loaded in uniaxial compression 1,2 and tension. 5,7,10 To our knowledge, the data in Fig. 2 are the first to be reported for loading in pure shear.…”
Section: B Elastic Strain From G(r ψ): Isotropic Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Calculating the elastic strain from shifts in the positions of peaks in the pair correlation function g(r), these groups observed that the elastic strain measured in this way increases with distance from an average atom (r), asymptotically approaching the macroscopically imposed strain. Given that elastic strain in either a crystal or an elastic continuum is expected to be independent of length scale, the question arises as to whether the observation of a length-scale dependent elastic strain in metallic glasses might be an artifact of either the experiment or the data analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration procedure is described in details elsewhere. 23 The patterns contain only broad maxima, without any additional sharp Bragg peaks, characteristic for fully amorphous samples. In order to ensure that the structure of the samples was homogeneous, each rod was scanned millimeter by millimeter along its axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%