2004
DOI: 10.1144/0016-764903-047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain, deformation temperatures and vorticity of flow at the top of the Greater Himalayan Slab, Everest Massif, Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
306
1
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
14
306
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been demonstrated in detail by research over the last two decades in the High Himalaya by, for instance, Burchfiel et al (1992), Grujic et al (1996) and Law et al (2004). They all showed that the top of the High Himalayan zone is bounded by a normal fault, the South Tibetan Detachment, and the base of the zone by the Main Central Thrust (Fig.…”
Section: Normal Faults In Shortening and Extensional Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This has been demonstrated in detail by research over the last two decades in the High Himalaya by, for instance, Burchfiel et al (1992), Grujic et al (1996) and Law et al (2004). They all showed that the top of the High Himalayan zone is bounded by a normal fault, the South Tibetan Detachment, and the base of the zone by the Main Central Thrust (Fig.…”
Section: Normal Faults In Shortening and Extensional Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…7) developed for the Greater Himalaya along the southern margin of the Tibetan Plateau was proposed initially from field geological mapping and strain data combined with P-T constraints and U-Pb dating of metamorphic rocks and leucogranites (Searle & Rex 1989;Grujic et al 2002;Searle et al 2003Searle et al , 2006Law et al 2004Law et al , 2006Searle & Szulc 2005;Godin et al 2006). The channel flow model infers that a partially molten middle crust layer was extruded south from beneath southern Tibet to the Greater Himalaya during the Early Miocene, at c. 23-15 Ma.…”
Section: Himalayan Channel Flow Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark & Royden 2000;Haines et al 2003) and (b) the Himalayan mid-crustal 'channel flow' model (e.g. Beaumont et al 2001Beaumont et al , 2004Grujic et al 2002;Searle et al 2003Searle et al , 2006Searle et al , 2010bLaw et al 2004Godin et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these locations deformation linked with the STD stopped at ~12 Ma [14]. In the UHCS rocks below the STDsz deformation seems to be closer to pure shear than to simple shear, which is also found in the other portion of the STD [35,70] and probably started prior to 22.0±0.3 Ma and 27.4±0.2, 1500 and 3500 m below the STD respectively. In Gyirong deformation in the STDsz was active at ~26 Ma if the leucogranite is effectively syntectonic.…”
Section: Timing Of Ductile Deformation Beneath the Ndmentioning
confidence: 63%