2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.04.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straightforward synthesis of substituted dibenzyl derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The σ-aryl ligand of choice was 1-naphthyl (1-Np) because its Ni(II) derivatives are more robust and convenient to work with than the phenyl analogues . Cassar’s catalyst, [(Ph 3 P) 2 Ni(1-Np)Cl], is a particularly easily accessible and versatile, air-stable complex. The replacement of the Ph ligand in [(PP)Ni(Ph)(CF 3 )] with 1-Np was justified by additional calculations showing that the barriers to the Ar–CF 3 reductive elimination for Ar = 1-Np and Ph are similar, 23.2 vs 22.6 and 27.7 vs 23.2 kcal/mol for PP = dippf and dcypf, respectively. The slightly higher barriers computed for the 1-Np complexes are apparently due to the extra energy cost of the bulkier naphthyl group adopting the proper conformation in the transition state.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The σ-aryl ligand of choice was 1-naphthyl (1-Np) because its Ni(II) derivatives are more robust and convenient to work with than the phenyl analogues . Cassar’s catalyst, [(Ph 3 P) 2 Ni(1-Np)Cl], is a particularly easily accessible and versatile, air-stable complex. The replacement of the Ph ligand in [(PP)Ni(Ph)(CF 3 )] with 1-Np was justified by additional calculations showing that the barriers to the Ar–CF 3 reductive elimination for Ar = 1-Np and Ph are similar, 23.2 vs 22.6 and 27.7 vs 23.2 kcal/mol for PP = dippf and dcypf, respectively. The slightly higher barriers computed for the 1-Np complexes are apparently due to the extra energy cost of the bulkier naphthyl group adopting the proper conformation in the transition state.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanaka et al showed that benzyl radicals can also be obtained by the photoinduced cleavage of cobalt(III) complexes, cis-[R 2 Co(bpy) 2 ]-ClO 4 , in the presence of benzyl halides. 21 Other methods for obtaining this conversion include the homocoupling of halides in the presence of various metals 22,23 (Ni, Mg, Mn, Zn, Cu, In, Cr, Fe, Ti), the homocoupling of Grignard compounds, 24 oxidative coupling, 25 Heck cross coupling, 26 the Wittig reaction followed by reduction 27 etc. Though effective, these methods involve expensive reagents and/or ligands, high catalyst loading, environmental hazards, and difficulties in catalyst recycling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective reductive coupling of benzyl bromides to the corresponding 1,2‐diphenylethanes in high yields has been realized by using SmI 2 , vitamin B12, Mn 2 (CO) 10 , Fe(acac) 3 , Cp 2 TiCl, Re(Br)(H)(NO)(PCy 3 ) 2 , NiCl 2 (glyme)/terpyridine, NiCl 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 , RhCl(PPh 3 ) 3 , Co(PMe 3 ) 4 /Me 2 Zn, and NiCl 2 /Sm . However, recyclable heterogeneous catalysis of these two reactions have not been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%