2004
DOI: 10.1080/1354786042000207326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storm in a rice bowl: Rice reform and poverty in Vietnam in the 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen and Tarp (2005), for example, predict that poverty will rise following a revenue-neutral lowering of trade taxes. Niimi et al (2004) show that the employment in garment and textiles industries has been adversely affected in the 1990s by trade policies. Liu (2001) analyzes poverty and inequality of Vietnam using the Vietnam Living Standards Surveys (VLSS) 1992-93 and 1997-98.…”
Section: Trade Liberalization and Poverty In Vietnammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jensen and Tarp (2005), for example, predict that poverty will rise following a revenue-neutral lowering of trade taxes. Niimi et al (2004) show that the employment in garment and textiles industries has been adversely affected in the 1990s by trade policies. Liu (2001) analyzes poverty and inequality of Vietnam using the Vietnam Living Standards Surveys (VLSS) 1992-93 and 1997-98.…”
Section: Trade Liberalization and Poverty In Vietnammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trade liberalization and poverty are also connected though government revenue and vulnerability of the economy to negative external shocks. Winters et al (2004) provide an extensive survey on the relationship between trade liberalization and poverty. While they find no simple relationship, the empirical evidence broadly supports the notion that trade liberalization alleviates poverty in the long run and on an average basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was used by other transitions studies (Glewwe et al 2002;Niimi et al 2004Niimi et al , 2007Justino et al 2008).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modeling of such poverty levels, it is usual in the literature either to employ a MNL model or to take the ordering in the observed outcomes into account via the use of ordered probit/logit models (see Watson, 2000; Glewwe et al. , 2001; Niimi et al ., 2004). The latter could be preferred because they utilize the inherent ordering of outcomes, but compared to the former, they are inflexible in that there is only one latent variable and hence only one parameter vector.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%