Storage phosphor radiography of wrist fractures: a subjective comparison of image quality at varying exposure levels

Abstract

Image quality of storage phosphor radiographs acquired at different exposure levels was compared to define the minimal radiation dose needed to achieve images which allow for reliable detection of wrist fractures. In a study on 33 fractured anatomical wrist specimens image quality of storage phosphor radiographs was assessed on a diagnostic PACS workstation by three observers. Images were acquired at exposure levels corresponding to a speed classes 100, 200, 400 and 800. Cortical bone surface, trabecular bone, soft tissues and fracture delineation were judged on a subjective basis. Image quality was rated according to a standard protocol and statistical evaluation was performed based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Images at a dose reduction of 37% were rated sufficient quality without loss in diagnostic accuracy. Sufficient trabecular and cortical bone presentation was still achieved at a dose reduction of 62%. The latter images, however, were considered unacceptable for fracture detection. To achieve high-quality storage phosphor radiographs, which allow for a reliable evaluation of wrist fractures, a minimum exposure dose equivalent to a speed class of 200 is needed. For general-purpose skeletal radiography, however, a dose reduction of up to 62% can be achieved. A choice of exposure settings according to the clinical situation (ALARA principle) is recommended to achieve possible dose reductions.

Initial Clinical Results with a New Needle Screen Storage Phosphor System in Chest Radiograms

“…In patients the results could have been different from the standardized phantoms. These results were confirmed by another trial in which fractured wrist specimens were employed [13]. Busch et al compared different storage phosphor systems to a flat-panel detector system at different dose levels in radiograms of a low contrast technical phantom, hand-phantom, abdomen-phantom and chest-phantom [14].…”

Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse

“…However, recent data have suggested that a performance comparable to the high-detail screen/film gold standard may be achievable with high-detail digital imaging at a substantially lower patient dose. 17 Digital facilities should optimize their acquisition and display parameters for high diagnostic performance, 19 and if the resultant images provide insufficient bony detail, an acceptable alternative should be sought. A radiologist should monitor the skeletal survey to ensure that appropriate high-quality images are obtained and to determine if additional views are required to fully define the pathologic alterations.…”

Yield of Radiographic Skeletal Surveys for Detection of Hand, Foot, and Spine Fractures in Suspected Child Abuse

“…Although the resolution of current digital imaging equipment is substantially lower, the diagnostic performance of these systems with demanding skeletal applications appears to be comparable to that of traditional high-resolution film-screen imaging techniques [23,24]. Therefore, at least equivalent performance to the standard of quality set in the film-screen era can be expected if the technical parameters of digital imaging systems are optimized for a high signal-to-noise ratio.…”